AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Natalia davis

CHEM120 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are willing to attend, use study guides, read the textbook, and ask for help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyHelpful in office hoursStrict gradingStudy guides matterMixed teaching clarity
  • many praise her patience and help, while others say lectures are boring or .
  • The class is not an easy A, but study guides, office hours, and steady practice can make it manageable.
  • Attendance and participation matter in many reviews, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are possible, but students say success depends on attending, practicing problems, using study guides, and getting help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The chemistry content is manageable with practice, but some students struggle with lecture pace, textbook dependence, and precision.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course-easiness score reflects classroom and lab experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and one says she awards 50 attendance points.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

and caring, but negative reviews warn about boring lectures and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Students call her strict or tough, but several also and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and practice problems, with a few students calling it heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

She is often helpful and , but some students find lectures slide-based, boring, or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

70/100

Reviews mention exams, , and occasional .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are in person, with mixed but , and study guides.

Main concern

The main concern is lecture clarity and .

What students said

“She sticks to her study guides!”
Chem120
“She is a ”
Chem120
“ if you need it.”
Chem120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and study-guide based, but some students describe the course as test-heavy and precision-focused.

Study Guides Similar To ExamsTest HeavyTextbook-Based Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams are similar to them, but test-heavy comments suggest moderate exam risk.

Study Guides Similar To ExamsTest HeavyTextbook-Based Preparation
“ .”
Chem120
“study guides that help for exams.”
Chem120
“What you see on there, are .”
Chem120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She sticks to her study guides! What you see on there, are .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is always present in .”

⚖️

45/100

“She is a ”

📘

58/100

“Just make sure to always do the study guides, as .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gives a lot of examples in her lectures but everything is on the slides.
  • She just reads off the .
  • She teaches off of the textbook & makes the problems understandable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If because she wants us to understand that Chem requires precision.
  • The class is due able if you put in effort.
  • Dr.Davis has been the yet!

Theme 3

🧪

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent in-person reviews provide detailed but , and exams.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Chem12015 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1