AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Richard Collett

PSY101 · PSYC101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him only if and and uneven support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict gradingPersonal tangentsMixed teaching qualityAttendance matters
  • The newest online review is strongly negative about teaching value and .
  • Older in-person reviews are mixed, with two students calling the class easy if students read and attend.
  • Getting an A , and test review than on low effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The class can be an easy A for students who read, attend, and use reviews, but the newest .

, while in-person evidence says the class can be easy with attendance and reading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is described as easy by older in-person students, but the online review says weak teaching makes performance harder.

Online evidence makes the course feel harder because of limited instruction, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is explicitly mandatory online and missing class.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because the recent online and the older in-person record is inconsistent.

Online evidence is negative, while and much older.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The online review calls him a and says he is picky about grammar.

Format shift

Online evidence is strict, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload centers on reading, participation, tests, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions many papers, while , and regular tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is split, but the most recent review says he gives little useful course instruction.

Format shift

Online evidence is poor, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention papers, participation, reading, and regular tests, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes papers and few graded items, while and class participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and split between one severe negative experience and two easier positive experiences.

Main concern

Support may be inconsistent for students who struggle.

What students said

“Hard class for me, studied my butt off, participated in debates and .”
PSY101
“extremely great teacher, spends time to make sure the class understands the lecture”
PSY101
“Easy class all you have to do is read the book participate in class and attend class because if you dont go.”
PSYC101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the professor rarely teaches course material and grades heavily.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Very useless in the course in the grand scheme of things, as he rarely talks about the course material and more so personal life.”
PSY101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention regular tests and test reviews, but they do .

Regular TestsTest ReviewsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test reviews but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

Regular TestsTest Reviews
“The ”
PSYC101
“show up for test reviews”
PSY101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very useless in the course in the grand scheme of things, as he rarely talks about the course material and more so personal life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“extremely great teacher, spends time to make sure the class understands the lecture”

⚖️

30/100

“he will grade heavily on your ability to perform well in a course he does not teach”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very useless in the course in the grand scheme of things, as he rarely talks about the course material and more so personal life.
  • extremely great teacher, spends time to make sure the class understands the lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard class for me, studied my butt off, participated in debates and .
  • Easy class all you have to do is read the book participate in class and attend class because if you dont go.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and opinions conflict sharply.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY1013 reviews
PSYC1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values