AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Frederic Patrick

NA · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take him only if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation mattersMixed gradingTime-consuming online workHard to reachLow content difficulty
  • The course content is usually described as easy or not rigorous.
  • Grades can be generous, but one .
  • Participation helps, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A or B is realistic with steady work, but and few graded items make it unsafe to treat as a free A.

Online evidence is more mixed because one student earned a D+ after grading disputes, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students describe the material as fairly easy or not rigorous, though reading and .

Online reviews mention time-consuming work, while and lecture participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others say it was not required.

Both online and in-person reviews contain mixed attendance signals.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students like the easier content and participation opportunities, but communication and .

Positive recommendations appear in both formats, but the strongest negative experience is from an online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students report generous outcomes, but tough-grader tags and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and reading are manageable, but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Reviews range from caring and helpful to hard to reach and unresponsive.

Format shift

In-person evidence is more positive, while online evidence is more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and test-heavy grading without proving a single dominant format.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and possible grade recovery through participation, but .

Main concern

The .

What students said

“I always arrived late and , and still got a B.”
na
“ ”
na

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the work is manageable but can be time-consuming, with one .

Main concern

Delayed or missing grading responses can hurt the final grade.

What students said

“it was time consuming but it wasn't rigorous”
na
“I constantly emailed him about it and he did nothing about it.”
na

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book format.

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“ ”
na

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“it was time consuming but it wasn't rigorous”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“He is however tough to get a hold of”

📈 Grade Reality

66/100

“I always arrived late and , and still got a B.”

⚠️

45/100

“he saidhewouldgradeitsoonbutneverdid.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are up to date with political matters
  • he values student participation greatly
  • If your having trouble, talking to him is the solution.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was time consuming but it wasn't rigorous
  • NotexbookandeasyHW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews give useful signals, but the sample is small and one review has almost no comment detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

na5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values