AI Rate Professor

Law

Eileen Mackin-Getzoff

PLGL103 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take this professor if you can attend class and keep up with homework, because and strong learning value.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLively ClassesSecond ChancesHomework-Aligned ExamsMandatory AttendanceMixed Lecture Clarity
  • Most recent students describe the class as lively, fair, and .
  • Grades look very reachable because students report second chances and .
  • One old review strongly criticizes and huge assignments, so the positive trend is not completely risk-free.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks realistic with and and exams closely based on assignments.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course covers a lot of legal material and can feel demanding, but recent students say the structure and examples make it manageable.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person PLGL103 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

sections.

, and they consistently list it as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students mostly recommend her because the class is lively, fair, and confidence-building despite a heavier workload.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in-person, with four recent positive reviews and one much older negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because students report second chances on papers and recent grades are A or A-.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Workload is not light because reviews mention a lot of , and one report of huge assignments.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Recent reviews praise lively teaching, examples, and confidence-building, while one old .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with the strongest negative review dated 2013.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final exam.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly very positive, with students praising lively classes, fair structure, and second chances.

Main concern

, and one older review reports and large assignments.

What students said

“Very lively and interesting class.”
PLGL103
“Gave everyone a second chance if as expected.”
PLGL103
“ .”
PLGL103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final, with one student saying 80% of the , but they do not clearly prove book or .

Midterm ExamFinal ExamHomework-Based Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exams, with homework strongly preparing students for the final.

Midterm ExamFinal ExamHomework-Based Final
“use of and .”
PLGL103
“No surprises as 80% of .”
PLGL103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gave everyone a second chance if as expected. A lot of examples. No surprises as 80% of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Very lively and interesting class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“I found my natural talent for debate.”

⚖️

82/100

“Gave everyone a second chance if as expected.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very lively and interesting class.
  • The class was lively and fun.
  • She is awful in her lectures, goes off on random stories and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of material was covered but there was a complete syllabus and use of and .
  • No surprises as 80% of .
  • Let me do a early.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Growth

  • Made me trust my own sense of logic and justice instead of tendency to try to parrot what I had learned in class.
  • I found my natural talent for debate.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only five reviews across a long time span, but four recent reviews are detailed and strongly consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PLGL1035 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values