AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Felix

STAT · M183CALC3 · MATH141PRECAL · MATH141 · MAT141 · ALG2 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid Felix unless you are strong at self-teaching math and comfortable with and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough graderSelf-teaching requiredFast lecturesMixed support
  • Most negative reviews say students must self-teach because .
  • , and several students report dropping or struggling.
  • A minority of students like him if they already work hard, ask specific questions, and want a demanding math class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

An A is possible for strong, disciplined students, but most comments say the , and difficult tests.

Online reviews show hard work can pay off, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content feels harder because lectures are fast, steps are skipped, and students often must fill gaps alone.

Online students still call it hard work, while and incomplete instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but , and outside help to survive the course.

Online reviews mark attendance optional, while and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

because the , and often forces self-teaching.

Online reviews are cautiously positive, but and dominate the evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Grades are often driven , and limited homework weight.

Format shift

Online reviews mention few graded things and test-heavy structure, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and too much self-teaching.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but as more frustrating and poorly supported.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students find him helpful when asked specific questions, but , and incomplete teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are more positive about availability, while and preparation.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

and homework often matters less than exam performance.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews describe test-heavy grading, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Many students say lectures do not prepare them well for .

What students said

“Run!”
MATH141
“You good at teaching yourself? Because that's the only way to succeed in his class.”
MATH141
“ while .”
21844

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are more positive but still warn that students must work very hard for the grade.

Main concern

The online evidence is only two reviews and both describe heavy work and .

What students said

“expect to put in work like it's your day job.”
MATH141
“you need to be prepared to work hard for your grade or you won't be satisfied.”
MATH141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students describe hard, test-heavy grading with limited notes and .

Test HeavyZero Notes AllowedHard TestsAmbiguous Handwritten TestsLimited Test Time

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, ambiguous handwritten tests, and limited time, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Zero Notes AllowedHard TestsAmbiguous Handwritten TestsLimited Test Time
“ .”
MATH141PRECAL
“The tests in his class so hard it's unnecessary”
MATH141
“the and ambiguous.”
MATH141

Online

but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things
“Lots of ”
MATH141
“work hard for your grade”
MATH141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You good at teaching yourself? Because that's the only way to succeed in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Does not prepare for lectures, gives confusing explanations, does not cover all of the content needed to complete the homework.”

⚠️

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

18/100

“expect to put in work like it's your day job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches very fast and does not show equations step by step.
  • Flies through material, skips steps, and ends classes early.
  • Sometimes messes up in examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HW was only 5% of .
  • The tests in his class so hard it's unnecessary and the study time required is too much to bare.
  • A tough class, doesn't carry you along.

Theme 3

🧭 About Support

  • .
  • If you don't ask for help you won't get any.
  • Does not have office hours, hard to understand his hand writing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 22 reviews show a consistent split: a few positive hard-work reviews but many detailed negative reports.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH14112 reviews
MATH141PRECAL4 reviews
218442 reviews
ALG21 review
M183CALC31 review
Show 2 more courses
MAT1411 review
STAT1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 1