AI Rate Professor

Languages

Emily Grigor

ASL121 · ASL · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a warm, engaging ASL professor who makes the language and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyOutstanding ASL TeacherCaring And KindFun Class ActivitiesParticipation MattersFlexible Support
  • Every analyzed review gives Emily Grigor a 5 quality rating, with strong praise for kindness, energy, and ASL teaching.
  • Students say the class is fun and supportive, but participation and .
  • The course is usually manageable, though some students mention fast pacing or communication challenges.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A-range grades are common and students describe flexible grading, but , and keeping up with the pace.

Both formats look grade-friendly, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students often call the class fun and easy to follow, though ASL can move fast and requires active practice.

Online reviews mention manageable work but occasional communication difficulty, while and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

as mandatory, and students repeatedly say participation matters for improvement.

In-person sections mostly require attendance, while the two and not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and deeply knowledgeable about ASL and Deaf culture.

Both online and providing broader and richer support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students , and flexible grading, with no serious harsh-grading pattern.

Format shift

Online and , though most evidence comes from in-person classes.

Workload

Light

80/100

Reviews , and one online review explicitly says it is not lecture or .

Format shift

Online evidence directly says the class is not homework heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, fun, knowledgeable, inspiring, and excellent at making ASL accessible.

Format shift

Both formats are excellent, with and activities.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

, and in-person reviews mainly describe participation-based learning.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely positive, emphasizing fun activities, caring support, Deaf culture insight, and strong classroom energy.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and a few students say the pace can be fast.

What students said

“she makes learning ASL so fun but also easy.”
ASL-121
“Class time is filled with group activities and games.”
ASL-121
“My only problem is that she moves super fast with the units so it's difficult to absorb all the info.”
ASL-121

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are very positive, saying she communicates clearly, cares about students, and keeps ASL manageable.

Main concern

One online student found it a little tough to keep up and noted a communication barrier at times.

What students said

“she made learning ASL way easier and entertaining for me and my classmates.”
asl
“It was a little tough to keep up.”
asl

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Emily G. Is FANTASTIC. I have had three ASL professors, and she is by FAR the best.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting teaching, support, participation, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“she makes learning ASL so fun but also easy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“If given the so many more classes from her!”

🤝 Student Support

82/100

“Great professor, she made every class fun and interesting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class time is filled with group activities and games.
  • She has made ASL fun and interesting, I really enjoyed having her as my professor for ASL 1 & 2.
  • She shares stories from personal experiences and it makes the class more enjoyable/ entertaining.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She is the sweetest professor I have ever had at AHC or anywhere!
  • she cares for the student's success and will help you if you are having any difficulties.
  • she always has a good attitude.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She is also flexible, so you don't have to turn in .
  • My only problem is that she moves super fast with the units so it's difficult to absorb all the info.
  • Not lecture or . Easy class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 16 recent reviews with unusually consistent ratings and detailed comments, though only two are online.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

asl11 reviews
ASL-1215 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2