AI Rate Professor

Film

Michele Simonsen

12344DWWF · FILM101 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and prefer in-person over online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear Due DatesPoor Email ResponsePaper HeavyMixed In-Person ExperienceWeak Online Support
  • Online reviews are mostly negative because students report , and little instructor presence.
  • In-person reviews are mixed, with two newer students calling the class simple and clear while older reviews report disorganization.
  • Grades can be decent, but the path , and weak feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A good grade is possible, but students must keep up with , and .

Online evidence shows more frustration with and unclear work, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The film content can be basic, but the course feels harder when deadlines, tests, and .

In-person reviews more often call the material simple, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as and mixed across online reviews.

Online attendance is mixed, while as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students would not recommend her because communication, organization, and .

Online reviews are strongly negative, while recent positive experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several students call her a tough or and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention harsh grading more often, while and confusing grading experiences.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and demanding assignments for the course level.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers, reading, and discussion work, while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

The dominant complaint , and disorganization, despite a few strong in-person positives.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly poor, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final paper rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews lean toward papers and discussions, while , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and complaints about disorganization, tests, and poor email response.

Main concern

The experience depends heavily on whether the class is organized and whether students can ask questions in person.

What students said

“Her class was not only simple, being made up of just watching movies, taking notes, answering questions, discussing, and learning basic film terms;”
FILM101
“Super easy. Assignments and due dates put out, do the work, get graded.”
FILM101
“the whole thing is just a blur already.”
FILM101

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly describe weak , and a low-support course experience.

Main concern

Students may have , and expectations with little instructor response.

What students said

“You literally do the and its like theres no teacher there.”
12344DWWF
“She didn't really interact with the class at all.”
FILM101
“Worse teacher ever. If your thinking to get it out of the way by taking it online. Don't!”
FILM101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a , but they do not clearly prove a .

Tests MentionedFinal PaperNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy
“The !”
FILM101
“The demand for 3 unit class is obsurd!”
FILM101

Online

Online reviews mention a and test-heavy tags, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Final PaperTest Heavy TagNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“the last paper (final) is worth 35% of our grade (5+ pgs)”
FILM101
“ answering).”
FILM101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You literally do the and its like theres no teacher there.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She doesnt give a crap about her students. and never sends announcements.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ , unless this is your only option.”

📄 Workload Reality

25/100

“Do the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not very good at responding to emails, ask in person if you have a question, or not at all.
  • She didn't really interact with the class at all.
  • She was amazing , and selecting great movies.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy. Assignments and due dates put out, do the work, get graded.
  • She can grade harshly, but if you follow the .
  • A deal-breaker might be that the last paper (final) is worth 35% of our grade (5+ pgs)

Theme 3

💬 About Organization

  • Don't rely on syllabus for so often and without warning.
  • a week or two to grade).
  • didn't post the correct dates, seems sloppy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 12 reviews across a long time span with detailed but highly mixed experiences, especially between online and in-person formats.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

FILM10111 reviews
12344DWWF1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2