AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Chantal Gariepy

FSN109 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can keep up weekly and self-manage, but if workload and slow email response are major problems for you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkMixed CommunicationOrganized Online MaterialsTough Grading ConcernsExtra Credit Available
  • Reviews are polarized, with some students calling the class excellent and , and poor email response.
  • Online reviews show the widest split, ranging from .
  • The course can be rewarding, but students need steady time management and comfort with reading, assignments, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A is possible with consistent work and , but and tough grading keep it from being easy.

Online evidence is polarized with both A-friendly support and C-level workload complaints, while but slightly more manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is not conceptually extreme, but , and .

Online short-term reviews make the course feel harder, while as not too hard when work is kept up weekly.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and in-person reviews marking it mandatory and others marking it not mandatory.

, so flexibility varies by section.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and supportive, but others warn about workload, grading, and slow replies.

Online reviews are more polarized, while and one severe workload complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

43/100

Some students say and clear, but several others report tough grading, unclear criteria, or .

Format shift

Online reviews include and fair grading praise but also serious grading disputes, while and unclear grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and compressed-term workload pressure.

Format shift

Online workload concerns are strongest in short terms, while in-person reviews range from manageable .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is sharply mixed because and caring support appear alongside repeated slow-response complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is highly polarized, while and communication concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention assignments, , and exams rather than a purely exam-based course.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, homework, and papers, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

students praising useful materials and one negative student calling the work and grading excessive.

Main concern

Students may face a and assignment load if .

What students said

“Overall, the class isn't too hard; keep up with the work every week, and you won't have trouble.”
FSN109
“Great class! Informative and entertaining teaching materials.”
FSN109
“This professor gives so so so much work.”
FSN109

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between well-organized, supportive experiences and , and tough grading.

Main concern

The workload can become heavy fast, especially in short terms or when communication is delayed.

What students said

“ . Truly.”
FSN109
“ in a week”
FSN109
“ .”
FSN109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, pop quizzes, and study materials, but they do not clearly prove a .

Tests MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedStudy Material ProvidedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Tests Not DifficultNo Clear Exam Policy
“ .”
FSN109

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and exams, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, or proctoring rules.

Pop Quizzes MentionedExams MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Beware of pop quizzes”
FSN109
“plenty of time to study for exams, and lets you know what material you will need to study.”
FSN109

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doing this class over winter or summer is a lot of work in a short amount of time if you're taking other classes or have other commitments, but this isn't her fault at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Prof. Gariepy organises her classes really well online so they're really easy to follow.”

⚖️

43/100

“The received 7.13/10 on an assignment which made no sense to me.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ in a week”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Truly.
  • Class was very well put together and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Offers easy , provides feedback, a little bit of a tough grader, very compassionate about students, over all easy
  • She grades fairly, and the directions are straightforward and clear.
  • she dropped me from an A to an F because do with typing and responding.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This professor gives so so so much work.
  • A good amount of and different types of articles.
  • and had enough time to complete them, if I kept my time management down.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

75/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 12 recent and detailed reviews, but credibility is limited by strongly conflicting experiences across terms and formats.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

FSN10912 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

5

C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1