AI Rate Professor

History

Chad Buckarma

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently from the book and handle weak communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive OnlineSelf TaughtTest HeavyCancelled Classes
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality low despite low reported course difficulty.
  • Online students report poor communication and heavy reliance on classmates.
  • In person students describe cancelled classes but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades can be decent, but students describe self-teaching and poor support as the real cost of earning them.

Online evidence shows a B with communication problems, while in person evidence shows an A+ despite self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is rated easy, but the course experience becomes harder because lectures and communication are unreliable.

Both formats suggest low intellectual difficulty, but the online issue is communication and the in person issue is missing lecture time.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

.

Online and in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Students mainly warn against taking him because support is weak and students are left to teach themselves.

The online review warns asynchronous students away, and the in person review also says the professor is not recommended.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The limited grade data includes a B and an A+, but comments .

Format shift

Online evidence has a B, while in person evidence has an A+ with poor instruction.

Workload

Light

65/100

The workload does not sound heavy, but tests and self-teaching create hidden effort.

Format shift

Online workload is unclear, while in .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students describe poor response time, cancelled classes, and little instructional support.

Format shift

Online criticism focuses on unresponsiveness, while in person criticism focuses on cancelled lecture time.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The in person review explicitly says the class is test heavy, while .

Format shift

Only the in person review clearly supports a test-heavy format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in person review says class is often cancelled, but .

Main concern

.

What students said

“He ALWAYS cancelled class”
21019
“You are on your own in this class”
21019

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the course is hard to manage because the professor does not respond reliably.

Main concern

Poor communication in an asynchronous online class.

What students said

“really bad at responding to students.”
21019
“ if you struggle with online asynchronous classes.”
21019

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in person review says tests happen even when lecture time is cancelled.

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
21019
“ if we had time on it”
21019

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You are on your own in this class, so unless you can learn .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in communication and testing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“really bad at responding to students.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ if you struggle with online asynchronous classes.”

🧪 Test Pressure

45/100

“ if we had time on it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • really bad at responding to students.
  • You are on your own in this class

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • Test heavy
  • if we had time on it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the signal is consistent but thin.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

210192 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values