AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Sherman Vernon

PE146 · FT310 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can handle a strict, physical, participation-heavy class with inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing instructorMandatory participationArbitrary gradingSupportive for motivated studentsUnclear instruction
  • Reviews are sharply split, with two strong positive reviews and several severe negative reviews.
  • Positive reviews say Vernon is motivating and supportive if students put in effort.
  • Negative reviews repeatedly complain , and poor professionalism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned A grades, but the class requires effort and as arbitrary.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course seems physically and procedurally demanding rather than academically impossible, with .

Only in-person reviews exist, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Every review with as mandatory, and participation is a major part of the class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because severe negative reviews outnumber positive ones and raise concerns about clarity and grading.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

A grades are possible, but and unclear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The class requires mandatory participation, physical effort, group work, essays, and strong engagement.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews praise his support, but several negative reviews describe unclear instruction, contradictions, and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention participation, workouts, group projects, essays, and being graded by few things, with .

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, and reviews and serious complaints about instruction and grading.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear instruction and .

What students said

“There is .”
FT310
“Excellent instructor that is experienced and effective.”
PE146
“ .”
PE146

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as long as you're willing to put in the work and utilize his support.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“There is .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“Not reccomended.”

⚖️

28/100

“Grades are completely arbitrary.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent instructor that is experienced and effective.
  • There is .
  • This professor is horrible.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort and Participation

  • as long as you're willing to put in the work and utilize his support.
  • If you're willing to put in the effort, he's willing to help you reach your goals.
  • He constantly contradicts instruction and lied to us constantly throughout the course.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • .
  • He told us himself that he barely even read the .
  • He is extremely hard to trust or please.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

and contain detailed comments, but the opinions are sharply polarized.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FT3104 reviews
PE1462 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1