AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anna Kopcrak

MATH123 · MATH311 · CRN21632 · STATC1000 · MATH141 · SUPPORTCLASS · MATH100 · FOUNDATION20562 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive math teacher and are ready for , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and AccessibleLots of HomeworkTough GraderParticipation MattersTest Heavy
  • Students often , and willing to help struggling math students.
  • The course , and regular tests.
  • Grades can be fair with effort, office hours, and , but students who fall behind struggle quickly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

Good grades are possible, but students repeatedly say you must keep up with , and office-hour help.

The only online review is positive but too limited; and show much heavier grade effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content is manageable with help, but many students describe hard material, fast consequences for falling behind, and frequent assessments.

Online evidence sounds easier, while and testing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory or warn that skipping class makes passing difficult.

The online , and in-person reviews also heavily support mandatory or .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

79/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and helpful, but the workload and students.

The online review recommends her, while but include several strong workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, partial credit, and feedback help, but tough-grader comments and .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is thin; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students frequently mention daily , and lots of practice work.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions group work only, while .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Many students praise her energy, care, accessibility, and explanations, though some recent reviews call her disorganized or .

Format shift

The online review is strongly positive, while but more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Reviews mention frequent quizzes, tests every two or three weeks, finals, and .

Format shift

Online assessment details are unclear; and quizzes as central.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and energetic math instructor whose classes require frequent work, attendance, and testing.

Main concern

Students , and .

What students said

“ IVE EVER HAD”
STATC1000
“Work can be diffucult makes you have to work for that grade.”
MATH123
“Anna is such a sweet soul and math.”
MATH123

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review describes a Zoom class with group work and a .

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one incomplete-course review.

What students said

“I took it over zoom and we did group stuff.”
MATH311
“She was super upbeat and nice.”
MATH311

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with frequent quizzes and , and one review mentioning cheat sheets.

Frequent QuizzesTests Every Two WeeksIn-Class ExamsNo Test CorrectionsMixed Cheat Sheet Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews show regular quizzes and and one mention of cheat sheets.

Frequent QuizzesTests Every Two WeeksIn-Class ExamsNo Test CorrectionsMixed Cheat Sheet Evidence
“all her tests are final, you only ”
MATH123
“we were aloud to use our cheat sheet on the tests.”
math100
“test every 2 or 3 weeks”
MATH141

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Anna is such a sweet soul and math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

80/100

“She makes sure everyone understands something before moving on, so SPEAK UP and ASK questions.”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“ IVE EVER HAD”

⚖️

45/100

“Values putting the effort on a test even if you get a question wrong you still get lots of points.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes sure everyone understands something before moving on, so SPEAK UP and ASK questions.
  • she explains difficult .
  • She wants students to succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Work can be diffucult makes you have to work for that grade.
  • Although this class is very and is one of the hardest working teachers I've had.
  • she's a funny professor but classwork is a lot its very easy to fall behind

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests and Homework

  • IVE EVER HAD
  • all her tests are final, you only
  • a lot of homework and and test every 2 or 3 weeks !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 28 reviews from 2020 to 2026 with detailed and repeated , and exams.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH12311 reviews
math1005 reviews
SUPPORTCLASS4 reviews
CRN216322 reviews
MATH3112 reviews
Show 3 more courses
STATC10002 reviews
FOUNDATION205621 review
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

7

C 5 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1