AI Rate Professor

Law

Stephen Wagner

PLGL14 · PLGL101 · PLGL110 · BUS373 · PLGL109 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Stephen Wagner in person if you want engaging lectures and a high chance of an A, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Easy A HunterAmazing lecturesEasy A potentialFunny storytellerFew graded itemsOnline communication risk
  • In-person students overwhelmingly describe him as , and passionate.
  • Grades are often easy, with several A or A+ outcomes and comments about few graded items.
  • The single online review is sharply negative and warns about poor communication and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Multiple students report A or A+ , and even one A with almost no completed work.

, while the single online review also reports an A+ but with a poor experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students say he breaks down law material clearly, uses examples and stories, and makes classes easy to follow.

, while the lone online review does not provide useful content difficulty evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others say it was not mandatory or that a student still got an A after rarely attending.

, and the online review marks attendance mandatory without explaining the format.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students strongly recommend his in-person classes for engaging lectures, but the online review is a serious warning.

, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

A , and one student reported getting an A without doing major work.

Format shift

Both formats show high grades, but .

Workload

Light

82/100

, and note-taking as the main effort rather than heavy assignments.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe light work, while the and final as .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

In-person teaching is described as , and memorable, but the online review reports no communication or feedback.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while online teaching evidence is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and few graded items more than regular homework.

Format shift

Both online and small number of assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear, funny lectures and .

Main concern

Students often need to attend and because .

What students said

“Easy A.”
PLGL101
“ .”
BUS373
“ !”
PLGL101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is highly negative despite an A+ grade, mainly due to no communication and .

Main concern

Online students and .

What students said

“NO COMMUNICATION at all through the semester.”
PLGL101
“ .”
PLGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final, while online reviews only clearly mention midterm and final without proving proctoring or open-book rules.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalFew Graded ItemsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports a student-friendly exam setup because one review explicitly says the midterm and .

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalFew Graded Items
“It helped me with the , and final.”
PLGL101
“Graded by few things”
PLGL101

Online

The online review says the course only requires a midterm and , but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Midterm And Final OnlyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and ”
PLGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, separating the . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He is passionate and extremely knowledgeable about his subject yet is able to break everything down and and easily absorbed manner.”

📈 Easy Grade Signal

94/100

“I did not turn in , yet I got an A?”

⚠️ Online Risk

30/100

“NO COMMUNICATION at all through the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His fun teaching style personally helps me retain the information.
  • His lectures are awesome.
  • Excellent instructor. He makes class interesting and is hilarious.

Theme 2

📈

  • Easy A.
  • I did not turn in , yet I got an A?
  • though, as he doesn't post them online.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • .
  • Does not answer emails.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 14 reviews across many years, but most positive reviews are older and the only recent online review sharply conflicts with the in-person pattern.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PLGL10110 reviews
BUS3731 review
PLGL1091 review
PLGL1101 review
PLGL141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values