AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Adams

MATH309 · MATH331 · MATH513 · MATH141 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and class participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient math teacherFunny and caringClear gradingHeavy homeworkExtra credit
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Adams as patient, funny, and .
  • Grades are helped by clear criteria, , late-work flexibility, and , but homework and ALEKS matter.
  • One strong negative review reports poor alignment between lectures and exams, so the experience is not risk-free.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

An A is realistic because and forgiving, but , and class engagement.

Online reviews mention easy grading and required ALEKS, while , and attendance expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The math content is manageable because he slows down and explains clearly, though homework load and .

Online and evidence showing more variation in difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, but at least one review says it was not mandatory.

Online evidence includes one no-attendance case and , while as mandatory or important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students recommend him because , and helps students understand math.

Both online and in-person review sharply negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report extra credit, , and easy grading.

Format shift

Online evidence says he grades easily, while , and test correction opportunities.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not light because many reviews mention homework, ALEKS, applications, or workbook requirements.

Format shift

Online reviews mention ALEKS and tests, while and weekly responsibility.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students , and willingness to help, despite one severe negative review.

Format shift

Online reviews are fully positive, while complaint about preparation and exam alignment.

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

Grades appear to , and participation rather than one single format.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions tests and ALEKS, while in-person evidence , and extra credit.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

outside class, and willingness to slow down.

Main concern

Several in-person reviews mention mandatory attendance, lots of .

What students said

“He isn't in a hurry to move on until everyone in the class has an .”
40376
“Most of in each chapter.”
MATH141
“ so difficult and did not line up with "lecture".”
MATH141

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive, with , and easier grading, but ALEKS and .

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and .

What students said

“He goes over everything you need to know for homework and tests.”
MATH309
“He grade really easily and makes sure everyone in on board.”
MATH331

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Tests MentionedChapter Review QuestionsTest CorrectionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test questions from chapter reviews and difficult and misaligned.

Chapter Review QuestionsTest CorrectionsDifficult Exam Complaint
“Most of in each chapter.”
MATH141
“He and gives credit for it.”
MATH513
“ so difficult and did not line up with "lecture".”
MATH141

Online

Online reviews mention tests and ALEKS but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or .

Tests MentionedALEKS ImportantNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Tests and ALEKS are really important for .”
MATH309

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He isn't in a hurry to move on until everyone in the class has an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Doesn't mind slowing down and re-explaining things if need be.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“I would .”

⚖️

82/100

“At the end of the semester he lets you turn in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Adams is a wonderful teacher.
  • He really helped me learn math, im not that great at it.
  • The !

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Not super strict but there is quite a bit of .
  • He also gives you every opportunity to improve your grade.
  • You have to get the textbook and Aleks in order to pass the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • STAY AWAY!! Adams is so unprepared and goes off on random tangents.
  • so difficult and did not line up with "lecture".

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across many years give consistent, detailed evidence, though only two are online and one review sharply conflicts with the majority.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH3098 reviews
403762 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MATH3312 reviews
MATH5131 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values