AI Rate Professor

Art History

William Durham

ART120 · COS100126 · ART101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , but be cautious with Art History because students describe it as test-heavy and strict.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyTough graderLecture heavyGood feedback in drawingExtra credit available
  • Drawing reviews are strong, but Art History reviews are much more negative.
  • Students report , and strict attendance.
  • helps, but it does not fully offset the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks possible in Drawing, but Art History comments point , and real grade risk.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is manageable in Drawing but challenging in Art History because , and difficult exams.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and one review says missing class means losing quiz and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend him for Drawing but not for Art History, , and exams are strong.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Comments repeatedly describe tough or , though can soften the outcome.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students mention lots of , and class work every meeting.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality depends heavily on course, with but weak Art History lecture reviews.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and a final more than projects or assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

for Drawing and repeated complaints about Art History workload, exams, and grading.

Main concern

Art History students report difficult exams, frequent quizzes, and .

What students said

“I learned so much.”
ART120
“Midterm and and doesn't really go over it in class.”
ART101
“ and if you miss even one class you miss a quiz and !”
ART101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show frequent quizzes and difficult midterm and , but they .

Frequent QuizzesMidtermFinalPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Frequent QuizzesMidtermFinalPop Quizzes
“Midterm and and doesn't really go over it in class.”
ART101
“there was a .”
ART101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Highly recommend for Drawing 1 (but not art history I guess, haha)!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting course-specific patterns in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“for Drawing 1 he's a great instructor.”

⚖️

25/100

“ and if you miss even one class you miss a quiz and !”

🧪

45/100

“Midterm and and doesn't really go over it in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and teaches interesting techniques.
  • His lectures went on forever and had no significance on any go the online quizzes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This course requires alot of reading.
  • and if you miss even one class you miss a quiz and !

Theme 3

🧾 About Assessments

  • Each chapter involves a quiz.
  • there was a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across several years give useful patterns, but the sample is small and course-specific opinions conflict.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1012 reviews
ART1201 review
COS1001261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values