AI Rate Professor

Education

Thesa Roepke

ECS105 · ECS102 · ECS118 · ECS100 · ECS310 · ECS116 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
94.44%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorExcellent FeedbackClear GradingHigh Effort RewardParticipation Matters
  • Students consistently describe Roepke as , and highly supportive.
  • The course , but grading feels fair and improveable.
  • Online evidence is smaller but still strongly positive, especially for directions and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because , and lenient support offset the steady workload.

Online and , while in-person comments add more evidence of attendance and papers.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is approachable because and engaging, but , and fieldwork keep it from being effortless.

Online reviews emphasize clear directions, while and writing-heavy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory or important for passing, even though one later in-person review says it was not required.

Online evidence is limited but , and in-person evidence repeatedly says participation or .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and .

Both formats are strongly positive, with online reviews slightly fewer but still enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

She is not a free-grade professor, but , and effort-based support make grading forgiving.

Format shift

Online reviews stress understanding and corrections, while and earned grades.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is steady, with , and some lab or group work, but students usually find it manageable.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews mention papers, reading, and hands-on work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Comments repeatedly describe her as , and personally invested in students.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with stronger volume from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly , and willingness to help students improve.

Main concern

for the grade.

What students said

“She give you the opportunity to correct your work for a better grade.”
ECS118
“Her classes have a heavy workload but and chances to improve your grade if needed.”
ECS105
“Whatever grade you get, you legit earned.”
ECS118

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly excellent, with , and .

Main concern

not very hard.

What students said

“ .”
ECS105
“ but not too hard.”
ECS116
“Perfect teacher for online.”
ECS116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews give little exam detail, but the and the course is mostly assignment-centered.

Low-Difficulty TestsAssignment-Centered CourseExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Low-Difficulty Tests
“ so they are not hard at all.”
ECS105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She is very thorough in her curriculum delivery, incredibly knowledgeable and very personable.”

👍 Recommendation Level

97/100

“Would 100% recommend her!”

⚖️

80/100

“She give you the opportunity to correct your work for a better grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I found myself easily engaged during her lectures.
  • She made learning the material and the class fun.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her classes have a heavy workload but and chances to improve your grade if needed.
  • Whatever grade you get, you legit earned.
  • as long as you turn in the and follow up with the calendar you will pass her class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She cares for her students.
  • dont be afraid to reach out to her.
  • as long as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Based on 29 reviews from 2008 to 2026 with very consistent praise and enough detail across courses and formats.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECS11810 reviews
ECS1008 reviews
ECS1056 reviews
ECS1163 reviews
ECS1021 review
Show 1 more courses
ECS3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 12

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1