Martin Landeros

MATH313 · MATH309 · MATH181 · MATH331 · MATH123 · ALGBA331 · MATH311 · MATH511 · ALGMATH · MATH182 · MATH141 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATH181CALC1 · MATH · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 18/100
RMP rating: 2.0/5
Take again: 17.65%
Difficulty: 3.6

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently through heavy work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHeavy WorkloadTest HeavyDisorganized TeachingPolarizing Fit

Most reviews warn that , and .
, and weak preparation for exams.
A minority says he can help motivated math-focused students, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for some students, but most , and test pressure that make the grade costly.

The only online review is negative, while but mostly warn about high effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math often feels harder because students say , and poorly aligned with tests.

Online and in-person evidence both describe the course as hard to understand, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

34/100

Some recent sections mark attendance mandatory, but not provide a rule.

The online review marks attendance mandatory, while and term.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they feel they learn little, need outside help, and face heavy work or difficult tests.

Both the lone online review and the , though a few in-person reviews praise him for math-focused students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students mention cheat sheets or generous effort grading, but the , and low reported grade comfort.

Format shift

Online evidence is too thin beyond test-heavy tags, while but .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Many reviews describe lots of , and rushed units with little teaching support.

Format shift

The online review tags lots of homework, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most comments say he is confusing, disorganized, hard to understand, late, or prone to mistakes, despite a few positive reviews.

Format shift

Online evidence is very negative, and positive exceptions.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Reviews mention test-heavy , and a final worth 40 percent alongside heavy homework.

Format shift

The online review is tagged test heavy, while , quizzes, and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and difficult exams, with a few positive fit-based exceptions.

Main concern

Students often need outside help or self-teaching to survive the course.

What students said

“ , and brushes past things quickly.”
MATH141

“Learned nothing from his class, relied on YouTube videos.”
MATH181

“This will be a difficult class for someone who has average math skills, be prepared to spend A LOT of time doing the work.”
MATH331

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and says students do not learn, cannot understand lectures, and face heavy work and tests.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, and it reports poor teaching and high difficulty.

What students said

“Awful, I hate this class so much, u dont learn anything in his class.”
MATH311

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some sections allow cheat sheets or review sheets, but .

Test HeavyCheat Sheet AllowedFinal Worth 40 PercentWeekly QuizzesReview Sheets

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support cheat sheets in one section, weekly quizzes and review sheets in another, and .

Cheat Sheet AllowedWeekly QuizzesReview SheetsFinal Worth 40 PercentDifficult Exams

“you get to use cheat sheet for every test.”
MATH141

“The final is worth 40% of your grade.”
MATH331

“ , and he gives review sheets before tests that have the same types of problems that will be on the .”
MATH331

Online

The one online review is tagged test heavy, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Test Heavy

“Awful, I hate this class so much, u dont learn anything in his class.”
MATH311

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ !”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ , and brushes past things quickly.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ . By far the WORST.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“His workload is ridiculous. It ends up being over 300 problems every two weeks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

TA taught me more of the subject than he did.
Learned nothing from his class, relied on YouTube videos.
is horrible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

The is alot of hw online, while other classes use the book.
The final is worth 40% of your grade.
If you don't do the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

if Algebra 2 is the last math of your career. Otherwise, he is your man!!!!
If you want to learn, he is your guy. If you merely want to pass the class and .
If you're bad at math DO NOT take it with this professor!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Based on 50 reviews across many years, with repeated detailed complaints and enough volume to outweigh a small positive minority.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510

4 out of 52

3 out of 56

2 out of 57

1 out of 535

Course coverage

MATH33118 reviews

MATH1416 reviews

MATH3116 reviews

MATH1814 reviews

ALGBA3313 reviews

Show 11 more courses

MATH181CALC13 reviews

218281 review

ALGMATH1 review

COLLEGEALGEBRA1 review

MATH1 review

MATH 3311 review

MATH1231 review

MATH1821 review

MATH3091 review

MATH3131 review

MATH5111 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

A 1 · A- 2

B range

B 2

C range

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3

Martin Landeros

x x unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently through heavy work.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👍 Recommendation Level

📚 Workload Pressure

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Student Fit

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently through heavy work.