AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Jozwaik

ENG101 · ENGL511 · ENGLISH105 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you want a and , and feedback-driven revision.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives Good FeedbackExtra Credit AvailableHeavy Reading And WritingCaring And AccessibleSometimes Tough Grader
  • , and accessibility.
  • The workload is real, with reading, writing, participation, and .
  • helps offset difficulty, but this is not a no-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and , but heavy work and tough grading keep it from being an easy A.

Online evidence includes more A and A+ outcomes, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course is manageable with guidance, but reading, writing, participation, and .

Online reviews say clear instructions make the course easier, while and heavy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, with some online reviews marking attendance mandatory and many reviews not proving a .

Online reviews include several mandatory attendance marks, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because , and offers despite a demanding workload.

Both formats are mostly positive, but online reviews contain the clearest praise and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

helps, but and comments about confusing expectations prevent a lenient rating.

Format shift

Online reviews show both extra credit and tough grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and assignments that cannot be rushed.

Format shift

Both formats show workload pressure, with in-person comments especially blunt about not finishing work at the last minute.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as , and strong with feedback, despite some complaints about grading clarity.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are positive but more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention essays, exams, pop quizzes, group projects, participation, and assignments, so assessment is .

Format shift

Online reviews mention exams and pop quizzes, while , and writing work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and feedback, but several mention confusion, heavy work, or grading issues.

Main concern

Students and the workload heavy.

What students said

“She gives you lots so work so dont plan to do he one night before cause trust me you wont finish.”
ENG101
“She was a good teacher, but ”
ENGL511
“Good teacher, but is a .”
ENGL511

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly strong, especially for , and .

Main concern

Some online students report tough grading, pop quizzes, or .

What students said

“Ms. Jozwiak gives clear instruction that makes taking an online class a breeze.”
ENG101
“ and is very clear about what needs to be done to receive full credit”
ENG101
“Very unorganized with instructions and .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams with true-false and essay sections plus some pop quizzes, but they .

True False SectionEssay SectionPop Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final exam style.

Online

Online reviews mention true-false and and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

True False SectionEssay SectionPop Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“For the and an essay section”
ENGLISH105
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives you lots so work so dont plan to do he one night before cause trust me you wont finish.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Jozwiak is the best. She cares for her students, and she is willing to help when you need help.”

👍 Recommendation Level

80/100

“She's great. .”

⚖️

58/100

“She was a good teacher, but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. and .
  • and is very clear about what needs to be done to receive full credit
  • Good teacher, but is a .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • There are a lot of interesting activities you can do to boost your grade.
  • She's a
  • She gives you lots so work so dont plan to do he one night before cause trust me you wont finish.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • She is always avaliable and happy to help you.
  • Don't be afraid to ask. She has flexible office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

75/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews give useful evidence, but many are old and some are brief or vague.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10111 reviews
ENGL5114 reviews
ENGLISH1052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values