AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Benjaminn Perez

ES121 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this course unless you can handle , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Daily AssignmentsFast PacedOpinion-Based GradingReading Heavy
  • The only review is negative and describes heavy daily work during a fast winter course.
  • The and opinion-based.
  • Evidence is very limited, so the rating is low-confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

The only student earned a C and says frequent writing was needed for anything near a reasonable grade.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The winter course was fast-paced and required frequent reading and writing assignments.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The as not mandatory, but there .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The only comment is disappointed and , and .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The review includes a and says grades were often based on the professor's opinion.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The student reports daily Monday-Saturday assignments in a fast-paced winter course.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The only student says they were disappointed and links the poor experience to workload and .

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review centers on frequent half-page writing assignments and .

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review describes a disappointing, fast-paced course with and .

Main concern

Daily assignments and .

What students said

“ ”
ES121
“his grades were also often based on his opinion.”
ES121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm style, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, midterm style, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was but found myself pretty disappointed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting workload and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I was but found myself pretty disappointed.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“ ”

⚖️

15/100

“his grades were also often based on his opinion.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • writing a half page of work if you wanted anything near a reasonable grade

Theme 2

⚖️

  • his grades were also often based on his opinion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative signal is useful but not stable.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ES1211 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values