AI Rate Professor

Art History

A Allebe

ART110 · ART125 · ART112 · ART101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid A Allebe unless you can , and heavy self-management.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyMandatory attendanceHeavy workloadTough graderPoor communication
  • Most in-person reviews are strongly negative, especially about long lectures, poor communication, and heavy workload.
  • Getting an A is possible, but students , and stressful preparation.
  • The single online review is more positive, but it .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Several students earned A-range grades, but comments , and strict attendance.

The online review suggests forgiving deadlines, while costly.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students describe long lecture-heavy , and a need for prior skill in some art courses.

Online evidence is milder, but as harder and more frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory and say skipping class can cause students to fall behind.

, while the lone online review does not clearly describe attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most because of long lectures, workload, and communication problems.

The online review recommends her, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Tags and comments mention , and ungraded or .

Format shift

Online evidence suggests leniency on late work, while and .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students report lots of , and heavy preparation for exams.

Format shift

The online review only mentions long lectures, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Most comments criticize , and poor Canvas support despite one positive older review.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but limited, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and assignments, with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

, and projects, while the online review gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing long , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students say missing class, weak communication, and unposted materials make it easy to fall behind.

What students said

“Missed two classes within reason and am behind weeks later.”
ART112
“ .”
ART101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive and says she gives extra time without penalty, though lectures are still long.

Main concern

Long lectures remain a concern even in the positive online review.

What students said

“She gives you extra time if your not done with an assignment and .”
ART110
“Though she does give long lectures she a good professor.”
ART110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , while reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Tough TestsExam Preparation ConcernNo Clear Online Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and students feeling unprepared, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policy.

Tough TestsExam Preparation Concern
“I felt like I was never prepared for the exams in the class.”
ART101
“ ”
ART101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz format, midterm, final, webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Her lectures are long and boring.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

42/100

“Be prepared for a lot of .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very heavy and long and never posted in canvas.
  • She's nice, but doesn't know how to communicate.
  • . Makes the subject interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I felt like I was never prepared for the exams in the class.
  • No. Just no. Boring and painful class.
  • .

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload And Attendance

  • Missed two classes within reason and am behind weeks later.
  • There are several prompts throughout the classes.
  • Be prepared for a lot of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are seven reviews across many years with a consistent recent negative pattern, but one format has only one review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART1014 reviews
ART1101 review
ART1121 review
ART1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1