Susan Roehl

EMS301 · EMS102 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 98/100
RMP rating: 5.0/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 2.8

The decision

if you want a and are willing to attend and keep up with the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesCaringInspirationalClear gradingHands-on learning

Students consistently rate her teaching as excellent and supportive.
Grades look very strong, but EMS301 requires homework and attendance.
All evidence comes from in-person classes, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The grades are all A-range and one student calls her an , but EMS301 still requires homework, attendance, and participation.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

EMS102 sounds easy and confidence-building, while EMS301 is more demanding because it prepares students for NREMT tests.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

, and one review says skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review is highly positive and all students with a .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students report , and only A-range posted grades.

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

55/100

EMS102 sounds light, but EMS301 includes enough homework that students must stay on top of it.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe her as , and effective at building confidence.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews , and preparation more than exams.

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are extremely positive, especially for , and hands-on learning.

Main concern

Attendance and staying current with homework matter, especially in EMS301.

What students said

“Suz is AMAZING. Her class is fun and you will learn so much.”
EMS102

“stay on top of ”
EMS301

“She had a .”
EMS102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

“dedicated to prepare each one of her students to pass NREMT tests”
EMS301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Suz is AMAZING. Her class is fun and you will learn so much.”
Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Suz is AMAZING. Her class is fun and you will learn so much.”

⚖️

86/100

“She had a .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“What you need to know about her class if to stay on top of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Amazing lectures
She truly cared for her students
most of it was hands on

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

She an
She had a .
stay on top of

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

she has a huge heart
she is dedicated to prepare each one of her students
Suz was amazing!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are four detailed and consistent reviews, but the sample is small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMS1022 reviews

EMS3012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Susan Roehl

x x if you want a x x x and are willing to attend and keep up with the work.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

EasyA

Beginner

Mandatory

MustTake

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

📚 Workload Reality

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

❤️ About Character

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want a and are willing to attend and keep up with the work.

⚖️