AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Parissa Mahjoor

CHEMISTRY · CHEM101 · CHEM120 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you can self-teach chemistry and memorize study guides without much support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesCurve-based gradingStudy-guide dependentLow homeworkPoor support
  • Students consistently describe weak teaching, , and .
  • Grades can still be , and dropped exams.
  • The class fits strong memorizers more .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are possible because and uses study guides heavily, but and weak teaching.

The online review reports barely passing, while guides and curves.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The chemistry content is not described as extreme, but make it harder than it needs to be.

Online evidence points to self-teaching, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

online mandatory report and one in-person optional report.

Online evidence says attendance was mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because they describe poor teaching, , and needing outside resources.

Both formats are negative, but the online review is especially direct about relying on YouTube to pass.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and study-guide-based exams make grades more forgiving than the teaching quality suggests.

Format shift

, while the single online review does not support lenient grading.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students say there is , but studying and memorizing guides still matter.

Format shift

Both formats point to light assigned workload, with .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Reviews , and support is poor.

Format shift

Online and evidence adding poor help response.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and labs rather than regular homework.

Format shift

, while online evidence does not clearly describe exam structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but , and dropped exams can make grades recoverable.

Main concern

The to rely on memorization and study guides.

What students said

“Lectures are so confusing! does not teach them at all.”
CHEM101
“She does grade on a curve.”
CHEM120
“ if you want to know your stuff!”
CHEMISTRY

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the workload is light but the teaching and help are poor.

Main concern

The online concern is lack of teaching support and harsh expectations despite limited instruction.

What students said

“She does the bare minimum for teaching and feels like she's only there for the check.”
CHEMISTRY
“Was barely able to pass the class because of youtube vids.”
CHEMISTRY

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a study-guide and and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring policy.

Study GuidesCurved ExamsDropped ExamHard Final

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and a hard final, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Study GuidesCurved ExamsDropped ExamHard Final
“ and drops 1 out of 4 exams.”
CHEM101
“ but .”
CHEM101
“when studying for .”
CHEM120

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz format, midterm format, final format, open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you are a good memorizer or took chemistry before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Lectures are so confusing! does not teach them at all.”

⚖️

74/100

“ and drops 1 out of 4 exams.”

📚 Study Strategy

68/100

“Just remember, do the study guides.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does the bare minimum for teaching and feels like she's only there for the check.
  • She has a very thick accent that sometimes makes it difficult to understand her.
  • she is very lazy and and keep class boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and drops 1 out of 4 exams.
  • It is what saved me in this class, I went from getting a D on the .
  • She does grade on a curve.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • but .
  • when studying for .
  • She gives out 60 page study guides (CRAZY) but she pulls the exact questions so make sure you memorize them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 5 reviews, most are old, but their complaints are consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1202 reviews
CHEMISTRY2 reviews
CHEM1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values