AI Rate Professor

History

Josh Severn

HIST101 · HIS119 · HIST119 · HIST118 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if and , and writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear feedbackHeavy readingParticipation focusedClear grading criteriaStrict workload
  • , and engagement.
  • Grades can be good, but the and writing-heavy.
  • One negative review warns that and strict.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A grades are common, but , and some harsh grading.

Online evidence shows doable but heavy work, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The content is manageable, but the reading and writing load makes the course feel more demanding.

Online reviews emphasize reading and discussion work, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and participation repeatedly matters.

as mandatory, and the in-person-labeled review also marks it mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

, and the single in-person-labeled review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and , but one review directly says he grades harshly.

Format shift

Online evidence includes both clear grading criteria and harsh grading concerns, while the .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students describe a good amount of , and weekly written assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews carry most workload evidence, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

85/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide strong positive teaching evidence, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews mention notes, discussion posts, written assignments, paragraphs, and an .

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based work, with online reviews giving stronger evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single in-person-labeled review is positive and describes him as .

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“ and his assignments are always 2-4 simple paragraphs.”
HIS119

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, but , and written assignments.

Main concern

The main and writing.

What students said

“It was a LOT of work.”
HIST119
“the workload was pretty heavy but it was definitely doable.”
HIST118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Severn is an excellent teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and recommendation patterns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“Professor Severn is an excellent teacher.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“It was a LOT of work.”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Severn is an excellent teacher.
  • and his assignments are always 2-4 simple paragraphs.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a good amount of reading required in this course.
  • the workload was pretty heavy but it was definitely doable.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • he can be really strict.
  • he grades harshly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years are consistent on teaching quality, but format evidence is uneven and some reviews are old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1183 reviews
HIS1191 review
HIST1011 review
HIST1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values