AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Myra McGill

ACCT150 · ACCT105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and ask for help, but do not expect an effortless A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when askedClear grading criteriaHomework-heavyMixed explanationsReading required
  • Students report helpful support and .
  • , and Cengage tracking are recurring workload issues.
  • Reviews are split because some students found her caring while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Grades are possible with steady work, but the comments point to reading, homework, tests, and .

Online evidence is split by course, while but not an effortless grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content is standard accounting material, but managerial concepts and class.

Online reviews emphasize self-management through Cengage, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

30/100

as mandatory, while others do not provide a .

Both online and in-person evidence include unclear or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are evenly split because and feedback concerns.

Online reviews are sharply divided, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear grading criteria appears often, but reported grades and comments .

Format shift

Online and , but neither format proves lenient grading.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework and reading are recurring themes, though some students say the workload is average or not fully required.

Format shift

Online reviews mention Cengage homework and reading, while and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and care, but and inconsistent explanations.

Format shift

Online , while in-person teaching is more mixed but includes stronger praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and concept understanding.

Format shift

Online evidence names Cengage homework and tests, while and tests based on chapter concepts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , but also inconsistent explanations.

Main concern

You need to track Cengage due dates and understand concepts on your own.

What students said

“Shes awesome as a professor in person!”
ACCT105
“Professor is inconsistent with explanations and displays a lack of .”
ACCT105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between strong Zoom and and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ and will literally guide you through”
ACCT105
“there is as to why the work you submitted was incorrect”
ACCT150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Online tests on CengageChapter-based testsConcept-based tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and learning objectives, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Concept-based tests
“the concepts and learning objectives rather than problem solving”
ACCT105

Online

Online reviews say tests are on Cengage and based on assigned chapters, but they .

Online tests on CengageChapter-based tests
“ Cengage”
ACCT105
“ ”
ACCT105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Mcgill and will literally guide you through!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Mcgill and will literally guide you through!”

⚖️

55/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“Lots of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Professor is inconsistent with explanations and displays a lack of .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hardest part in my opinion was the managerial accounting part
  • Homework has fairly simple problems and the concepts and learning objectives rather than problem solving.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • and will literally guide you through
  • there is as to why the work you submitted was incorrect

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across 2021 and 2022 give useful but mixed evidence, with limited grade data and only a few detailed comments.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT1054 reviews
ACCT1501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values