AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kimberly Rose

MATH123 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can keep up with strict deadlines and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing LecturesTough GraderNo Late WorkLots of HomeworkFew Grades
  • one praises her lectures, while one strongly warns against taking her.
  • The grading and late-work policy are the main risk.
  • Getting an A looks hard because few grades, lots of homework, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students mention , and no late work.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math can feel clearer through her lectures, but the course experience is and workload.

, and they conflict on how manageable the class feels.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, while another says it was not.

The in-person-coded reviews conflict, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is split because and a strong negative review.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students mention , and no late work or .

Format shift

All grading evidence is from in-person-coded MATH123 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

One review directly tags lots of homework, and .

Format shift

Only in-person-coded reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student praises her explanations, but another describes her as one of .

Format shift

The .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Students mention homework, few grades, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person-coded reviews are mixed, with strong praise for but and late-work rules.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“the ”
MATH123
“Better off taking someone else.”
MATH123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and few graded items, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policy.

No Make-Up TestsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring policy.

No Make-Up TestsFew Graded Items
“does ”
MATH123
“Graded by few things”
MATH123

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Better off taking someone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching quality, grading strictness, workload, and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“the ”

⚖️

20/100

“shes still a .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

45/100

“Better off taking someone else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • kim is a professor who really does know what she's talking about.
  • the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she does NOT accept late work and does though
  • Lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

There are only two reviews, but both are detailed and show a .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1232 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values