AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Robert Adames

ET100 · ARCH122 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if and learn software independently when needed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGives Good FeedbackUnclear ExpectationsProject-Based WorkHelpful With QuestionsInconsistent Organization
  • Recent reviews are much stronger than the 2018 reviews.
  • and personal help, especially with software issues.
  • The and inconsistent grading communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades look reachable because several students earned A or A+ and the course is graded by few things, but .

Online evidence is positive but thin, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The content is introductory software work, but students without prior 3D modeling or AutoCAD experience may feel lost.

Online and , but both also show confusion early in the course.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Most available attendance entries say attendance was mandatory, with one in-person exception.

The single online review says attendance was mandatory, while review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but older reviews strongly warn about poor organization.

The online review recommends him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

A grades appear common, but delayed or .

Format shift

Online has little grading detail beyond few graded things, while and .

Workload

Light

70/100

Work is mostly projects and class-time modeling, with little evidence of .

Format shift

Online explicitly says no extra homework, while but some random model work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can be helpful and , but repeated complaints about unclear expectations lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive, while teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews describe projects, models, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to project-based assessment with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

later reviews and serious organization problems in older reviews.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Professor Adames was very helpful and took the .”
ET100
“ course.”
ET100
“He never graded a single thing.”
ET100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is very positive, with light workload and , but prior 3D modeling experience helps.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“One common complaint here about ET100 is that .”
ET100
“otherwise he's a great teacher who does a great job answering questions and .”
ET100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Adames was very helpful and took the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, structure, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Adames was very helpful and took the .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“ course.”

📦 Workload

70/100

“The workload was fair and most of the work could be completed during class time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • otherwise he's a great teacher who does a great job answering questions and .
  • He is one of the teachers who takes the that you can find in the software.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Structure

  • course.
  • Barely knew what was expected of me (still not 100% sure) until two months into the class.

Theme 3

📈 About Work and Grades

  • The workload was fair and most of the work could be completed during class time.
  • He never graded a single thing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years provide useful evidence, but opinions are split and the online sample is only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ET1005 reviews
ARCH1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3