AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Francesco Contu

CHEM150 · CHE120 · CHEM120 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle some self-teaching and professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFunny ProfessorCaringMixed Teaching ClarityHard TestsLight Homework
  • Most in-person students like his humor, care, and feedback.
  • Several students warn that tests and light.
  • The single online review is much less positive and says the class was confusing online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades seem achievable because homework is light and , but .

Online evidence points to passing rather than learning, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Chemistry feels manageable for some students, but , and self-teaching lower the ease score.

The online review is more negative about clarity, while but mostly more favorable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews with as mandatory, and one tag says skipping class hurts performance.

Online attendance was not mandatory, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and care, but several warn that learning and clarity can be inconsistent.

, while the single online review says not to take him if learning chemistry matters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Few graded items, clear criteria, labs, and online quizzes help, but .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both mention few graded items, but .

Workload

Light

76/100

Students report little or , though reading, quizzes, labs, and tests still require preparation.

Format shift

The online review mentions lecture-heavy work, while .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students call him caring, funny, and helpful, but some cite mistakes, confusion, and weak organization.

Format shift

, while the online review strongly criticizes clarity and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses tests, quizzes, labs, and , so .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions few graded items and quizzes, while , and homework practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about humor, care, and explanations, but .

Main concern

, and inconsistent teaching clarity are the main risks.

What students said

“ and is very good at explaining”
CHEM120
“ and ”
CHEM120
“I had to haha”
CHEM150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the class was confusing and despite few graded items and .

Main concern

Online handwriting, organization, and clarity were criticized.

What students said

“He is very hard to understand and couldn't read this handwriting on the whiteboard online”
CHE120
“ ”
CHE120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as hard, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Hard TestsHard QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book or closed-book.

Hard TestsHard Quizzes
“ and ”
CHEM120
“ ”
CHEM150

Online

The online review does not clearly prove online exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or webcam rules.

Few Graded Items
“Graded by few things”
CHE120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher. really wants students do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Great teacher. really wants students do well.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ ”

⚖️

66/100

“Graded by few things”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is very good at explaining
  • Very helpful and caring professor.
  • I had to haha

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • He is very hard to understand and couldn't read this handwriting on the whiteboard online

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years give a consistent mixed pattern with enough detail to separate online and in-person experiences.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1206 reviews
CHEM1503 reviews
CHE1201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1