AI Rate Professor

English

J Jozwiak

ENGLI101 · ENGL101 · ENG105 · ENGL507 · ENGLI511 · ENGL513 · ENG110 · ENG1 · ENG101FRSHCOMP · ENG512 · ENGL300 · ENG101 · ENG511 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if , and detailed writing expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict GradingHeavy WorkloadPolarizing TeachingHelpful One-on-OneOrganized Assignments
  • Student opinion is highly split, with strong praise from some students and severe criticism from others.
  • The main risk is the workload and .
  • Students who stay organized and complete all work can do well, but the class is not a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say students must keep up with heavy work and .

Online evidence shows heavy assignments and exams, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not always conceptually extreme, but , and workload make it feel harder.

Online reviews are split on organization, while and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, and one tag warns that skipping class hurts success.

and in-person records where attendance is provided.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but many others strongly warn against her because of grading and workload.

Online and containing more severe negative comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call her harsh, picky, or unfair, even when a few say she grades fairly with a rubric.

Format shift

Online has one fair-grading report, but .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of homework, , and Plato hours.

Format shift

Online workload is explicitly heavy in ENG110, and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is mixed because some students praise her help and organization while others describe confusion and poor tone.

Format shift

Online reviews conflict sharply, and frustrating.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and some exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments and exams, while , and grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also polarized, with praise for help and clarity but and busy work.

Main concern

and heavy writing work are the biggest recurring complaints.

What students said

“you are going to work for your grade!!!!!”
ENG512
“ . Extremely picky.”
ENG105
“goes around the classroom and actually sit downs and help you one on one.”
ENG511

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and and harsh.

Main concern

Online organization and .

What students said

“Professor .”
ENG101
“ , and .”
ENG101FRSHCOMP
“It is a lot of work! 4 Assignments, 3 Wikis, 8 Discussion boards, 2 Exams, 10 hours of Plato.”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed, with one online review mentioning exams but .

Two Exams Mentioned OnlineMidterm and Final MentionedNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Online evidence mentions two exams plus a midterm and final, but reviews .

Two ExamsMidtermFinal
“4 Assignments, 3 Wikis, 8 Discussion boards, 2 Exams, 10 hours of Plato.”
ENG110
“I failed the Midterm and Final and still got a B, because .”
ENG110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She can be hard on you but that's only cause she wants her students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

25/100

“Grades harsh except for discussions. Wants perfection for an A...unrealistic.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“It is a lot of work! 4 Assignments, 3 Wikis, 8 Discussion boards, 2 Exams, 10 hours of Plato.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She can make some of , but goes around the classroom and actually sit downs and help you one on one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor .
  • .
  • She is a real teacher, is up front on what she expects, and and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you are going to work for your grade!!!!!
  • . Extremely picky.
  • Grades fairly, just follow the rubric.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • Ridiculous amount of busy work!
  • Good teacher, but can be strict and gives plenty of work.
  • just be on top of your work and you will do good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 20 reviews across a long time span with consistent , and polarized teaching.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1054 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENG5112 reviews
ENG5122 reviews
ENG11 review
Show 8 more courses
ENG101FRSHCOMP1 review
ENG1101 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL3001 review
ENGL5071 review
ENGL5131 review
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLI5111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values