AI Rate Professor

History

Klaus Fischer

ETHICPHIL · PHIL101 · PHIL102 · HIST105 · HIST108 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if , and want a low-workload class with few graded items.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesFew AssignmentsEssay ExamsUnclear TeachingLight Workload
  • The course can be easy to pass because .
  • Teaching quality is highly polarized, with recent reviews strongly negative.
  • Students often describe lectures as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The A looks reachable because several reviews mention few assignments, simple criteria, study guides, and A grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The workload and grading structure are easy, but and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Some reviews say attendance is not mandatory or pointless, while as mandatory.

, and the evidence conflicts by class and year.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Recent detailed reviews strongly warn against him because of , and offensive-feeling lectures.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

because grades depend on few items with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Many reviews , and paper.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews are outweighed by detailed complaints about boring lectures, confusion, and unreliable support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment is mainly midterms, finals, essays, and a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and but weak, boring, and sometimes troubling lectures.

Main concern

Students may need to learn independently because lectures are often described as .

What students said

“Your total grade is the midterm and the final. .”
HIST105
“Clarity lacks.”
PHIL102
“Easily the .”
HIST108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show traditional midterm and final exams, sometimes with exact study guides, but .

MidtermFinal ExamEssay TestsStudy Guide

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exams with essay formats and study guides, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

MidtermFinal ExamEssay QuestionsStudy Guide
“For our and final.”
PHIL102
“2 essays and 10 "short essays", no multiple choice.”
HIST108
“Study guides are given up to two weeks prior to the test, and the questions on it are exactly as they'll appear on the exam.”
HIST105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, you really dont need to go to this class & the bottom line is just find a different instructor for this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and teaching concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“This teacher is boring, constantly mixes up groups so and himself.”

📈 Grade Effort

82/100

“All are very simple, , and reviews are done well in advance of the actual date of the assignments.”

📝 Assessment Style

82/100

“Your total grade is the midterm and the final. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher is very opinionated and says many things that are just downright untrue.
  • Clarity lacks.
  • Easy class but boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A , and term paper.
  • .
  • Gives you a study guide.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Risk

  • Nothing he says in .
  • You can't find him at his office hours.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 8 reviews, but several are detailed and the and poor teaching is consistent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST1082 reviews
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL1022 reviews
ETHICPHIL1 review
HIST1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values