AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Paul Eybel

PYS113 · PSY113 · PSY101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want an interactive psychology class with and active discussion.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation mattersClear grading criteriaCaring instructorDiscussion-heavyEngaging lectures
  • Most students strongly praise his teaching, organization, and care.
  • The course rewards participation and steady .
  • because one online review reports a sharply negative classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Several students earned A or A- grades, and comments describe predictable, not hard work, but participation still matters.

Online reviews include A-level grades and accountability, while and limited homework.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is manageable and organized, but students must engage in discussions and self-reflection.

Online evidence is mixed, while in-person evidence consistently says the class is straightforward and easy to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and one tag says skipping class risks failing.

Both online and in-person reviews are marked mandatory, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and engaging discussions despite one severe negative review.

, while online reviews include both strong praise and one strong warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and predictable assignments suggest fair-to-lenient grading when students participate.

Format shift

Online evidence shows A-level grades, while and a few important graded tasks.

Workload

Light

76/100

Students describe steady but , and not much homework or quizzes.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on accountability and helpfulness.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Six of seven reviews praise his clarity, care, organization, and engagement, though one online review is strongly negative.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mixed by one serious negative report.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments point , and quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

and quizzes more clearly, while online reviews do not describe assessment structure in detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe him as , and discussion-focused.

Main concern

Students must attend and participate because discussion and a few graded tasks matter.

What students said

“ .”
PSY113
“This class has been one of my absolute favorites.”
PSY113
“He does but the few that he does gives out, impact your grade.”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about accountability and helpfulness, but one review reports a serious negative interaction.

Main concern

Online experiences and classroom interaction.

What students said

“holds the students accountable for their actions and work which is greatly appreciated”
PSY113
“ .”
PYS113
“Arrogant, likes to listen to himself talk, and presents his opinions as facts.”
PSY113

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterms, finals, or proctoring rules.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class has been one of my absolute favorites.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“This class has been one of my absolute favorites.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

76/100

“ , but predictable.”

⚠️ Online Concern

50/100

“Arrogant, likes to listen to himself talk, and presents his opinions as facts.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Eybel is one of .
  • He really cares about this class, and is super personable.
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • , but predictable.
  • He does but the few that he does gives out, impact your grade.

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • Be prepared for .
  • This class makes you look into yourself.
  • He makes students feel like our views matters and and real learning.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • Arrogant, likes to listen to himself talk, and presents his opinions as facts.
  • holds the students accountable for their actions and work which is greatly appreciated

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across online and , but all are from 2021 to 2022 and include one major outlier.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY1135 reviews
PSY1011 review
PYS1131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values