AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Klaus Fischer

CRITICALTHINKI · PHILOSOPHY · PHILO101 · PHILO102 · PHILOS102 · EXANDREALITY · PHIL200 · PHY114 · EXISTREALITY · PHIL114123 · PHIL102 · CRITICALTHINK · HIST108 · PHILOS114123 · PHIL121 · PHIL101 · PHILO114 · PHILS301 · HISTORY105 · PHIL114 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you are genuinely interested in the subject and can handle long lectures with limited structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyPolarizing teacherVague expectationsTest heavyKnowledgeable but dry
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who admire his knowledge and students who find the class boring and unclear.
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and repeatedly warn against taking him.
  • Grades may be manageable for attentive students, but the class , and unclear expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students say an A is possible with notes and study guides, but and few graded items make the grade risky.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The material is sometimes easy, but , and vague test expectations raise the real difficulty.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Several reviews report mandatory attendance or say skipping class makes passing unlikely.

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recent because , and hard to connect to tests.

The and is especially negative in newer reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, but others describe vague expectations and grading by few high-stakes items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

65/100

There is , but , and study guides can still require focused preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is widely seen as knowledgeable, but many students say his teaching is dry, rambling, and poorly structured.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and few graded items more than regular assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing professor with deep knowledge but frequent complaints about rambling , and limited student interaction.

Main concern

The main risk is vague, lecture-heavy instruction that many students find boring or unhelpful.

What students said

“He just goes on and on.”
HIST108
“His class has no structure and his expectations are often vague and unclear.”
PHILO114
“Take this class if you actually are interested.”
PHIL102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Test HeavyStudy GuidesMidtermFinal ExamFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Test HeavyStudy GuidesMidtermFinal Exam
“There's no homework, only 4 tests and gives out a study and helpful.”
HIST108
“ and a term paper.”
PHIL102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has a wealth of knowledge and he demonstrates that in his lectures, but that's all he does is talk the whole time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He just lectures, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ ”

📝

48/100

“It's hard to know what he .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He just goes on and on.
  • All he does is lecture, SNOOZEFEST.
  • He is extremely fascinating.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If have no problem getting an A.
  • You don't really know what's going to be on the tests, but he's a .
  • , but they are mostly just regurgitating the and definitions.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure & Expectations

  • His class has no structure and his expectations are often vague and unclear.
  • He doesn't provide instructions and won't say what he's looking for.
  • Nothing .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many years with , and polarized student reactions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 59

Course coverage

PHIL10211 reviews
HIST1088 reviews
PHIL1146 reviews
PHILO1145 reviews
PHIL1213 reviews
Show 15 more courses
HISTORY1052 reviews
PHILOSOPHY2 reviews
CRITICALTHINK1 review
CRITICALTHINKI1 review
EXANDREALITY1 review
EXISTREALITY1 review
PHIL1011 review
PHIL1141231 review
PHIL2001 review
PHILO1011 review
PHILO1021 review
PHILOS1021 review
PHILOS1141231 review
PHILS3011 review
PHY1141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1