AI Rate Professor

English

Wilma Sukrad

READ110 · ENG513 · ENGL513 · ENG512 · ENG514 · ENG101 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take her only if , and heavy writing work while asking for help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardConfusing assignmentsTough graderStrict attendanceParticipation mattersHelpful but unclear
  • Students and willing to help, but .
  • The class is not an easy A because , and presentations create pressure.
  • All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A good grade is possible, but students describe , and lots of writing work.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels difficult mainly because and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as required or strongly tied to grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Students recommend her when they value kindness and feedback, but many warn that and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students call her picky, hard, or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Students mention lots of , and a research-paper final.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

44/100

She is often described as nice and helpful, but repeated comments say her explanations and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, assignments, presentations, participation, and a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a polarizing teacher who is often kind and helpful but , and .

Main concern

and strict grading are the main risks.

What students said

“ .”
ENG101
“Although there is a lot of and if you try hard and do all your work you will pass.”
ENG514

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention papers, presentations, and a , but they do not clearly prove exam proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Final Research PaperPresentationsPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and presentations, but they do not clearly prove traditional exam rules.

Final Research PaperPresentationsPapers
“we did 4 essays and the .”
ENG514
“There are so many presentations.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a nice teacher, and whenever she's .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“She's a nice teacher, and whenever she's .”

⚖️

20/100

“She is extremely hard and her way of teaching the course is very complicated and confusing.”

📚 Workload Reality

26/100

“We wrote about 6 papers throughout the semester and most of them were 2-3 pages long.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Wilma is such a great teacher that is willing to help her students.
  • . She didn't do a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I did ABOVE and beyond what I needed to do, she is a and has favorites.
  • Halfway through the semester the class average was a 58%, and there were really smart people there.

Theme 3

🧭 And Participation

  • She takes participation seriously.
  • She is very strict when it comes to attendance, she will make you sign in every day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent picture, though there is no online evidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENG5136 reviews
ENG5122 reviews
ENG5142 reviews
ENGL5132 reviews
Show 1 more courses
READ1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1