AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Allyson Gerard

AJ102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you can tolerate long lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyTest HeavySo Many PapersGroup ProjectsPassionate
  • Student experience is sharply split between one very negative review and one positive review.
  • Grades appear easy, but the , and lecture-heavy.
  • as mandatory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Both reported grades are A-range, and one student calls the assignments easy despite complaints about the class.

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course is rated low difficulty, but , and .

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory.

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is split because one student strongly warns against the class while another liked her passion and assignments.

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Both students earned A-range grades, and one describes the assignments as easy.

Format shift

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload includes , and test-heavy expectations.

Format shift

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Teaching feedback is polarized between boring, disconnected lectures and .

Format shift

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and group projects, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

All authoritative review counts place the evidence in the in-person section.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-counted evidence is polarized, with and another praising her passion and easy assignments.

Main concern

Long lectures and assignments may feel disconnected from class content.

What students said

“SUPER BORING, talks way too much, note taking and lectures.”
AJ102
“She is very passionate for her job, and you can tell by the examples.”
AJ102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support that the course is test-heavy, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove specific exam policy.

Test Heavy
“ , So many papers”
AJ102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“SUPER BORING, talks way too much, note taking and lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Pattern

35/100

“She does like to do group investigations and projects but and class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • SUPER BORING, talks way too much, note taking and lectures.
  • She is very passionate for her job, and you can tell by the examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A-
  • A
  • and class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews are available, they are old, and the opinions strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AJ1022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values