AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Tracy Phillips

CHEM120 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
81.25%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if possible, because the class rewards steady work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsCaringPractice-Test AlignedExtra CreditAttendance Matters
  • , and caring support.
  • Getting an A is realistic if , and attend when required.
  • Online reviews are much more mixed because some students felt the format became video-heavy and overloaded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable because , and tests often match reviews, but students still need to do the work.

and test alignment, while online evidence shows more workload risk.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Chemistry is not effortless, but students repeatedly say Phillips makes concepts simple and .

In-person students report clearer learning, while online students split between easy organization and weak video-heavy delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

but clearly mandatory or practically necessary in several in-person reviews.

, while in-person reviews vary from optional to strict.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because and supports students, though online reviews lower confidence.

, while online reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is often forgiving through , and full credit for attempted homework.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest leniency evidence, while and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is manageable for organized students but , and some complaints about many assignments.

Format shift

Online workload looks heavier and more compressed, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students usually describe Phillips as , and strong at making chemistry understandable.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in person but noticeably weaker in online comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to combine , and sometimes a final.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, homework, and weekly lab, while , and practice reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, especially , and supportive teaching.

Main concern

Attendance and test preparation matter, and .

What students said

“She has the easiest ways of explaining things and it all makes sense.”
CHEM120
“The .”
CHEM120
“ any absence.”
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one strong recommendation and two students frustrated by video-heavy delivery or workload.

Main concern

Online students may need to manage posted lectures and heavy weekly work without much live structure.

What students said

“all lectures posted online”
CHEM120
“doesn't know how to teach an online class”
CHEM120
“Everything posted in advance so easy to get done early.”
CHEM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly because reviews mention formulas given, study guides, and .

Formula SupportPractice-Test AlignmentStudy GuidesNo Final In One Review

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support practice-test alignment, study guides, formula support, and , but .

Formula SupportPractice-Test AlignmentStudy GuidesNo Final In One Review
“most formulas are given on the test”
CHEM120
“Has study guides and they are EXACTLY like the test.”
CHEM120
“There are 4 tests and a final.”
CHEM120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has the easiest ways of explaining things and it all makes sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She has the easiest ways of explaining things and it all makes sense.”

📈 Grade Path

86/100

“Homework is given 100% if you try and she corrects .”

🧪

80/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chill teacher and great lecturer.
  • She makes it very easy to comprehend
  • She knows the material and knows how to make it simple for others to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • She gave an assigment which really helped me to get the grade I got.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • all lectures posted online
  • Everything posted in advance so easy to get done early.
  • I love her as a person but not an online teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years give rich and mostly consistent evidence, though online evidence is limited to three reviews.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM12016 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 7 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values