AI Rate Professor

Communication

Ashley Greco

SPCH106 · SPEECH106 · SPCH102GROUP · SPEECH102 · SPCH103 · GROUPCOMM102 · COMM201A · SPCH101 · SPEECH101 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you are willing to attend consistently, do the work, and ask for help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict AttendanceHeavy WorkloadMixed Teaching QualityTough GraderHelpful If Approached
  • Reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising her organization and care while .
  • The class often requires , and speeches.
  • An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it takes steady work and tolerance for strict structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

A grades are possible, but comments repeatedly , and steady work.

Online evidence is especially workload-heavy, while if students consistently do the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The communication content is not always advanced, but group projects, speeches, papers, and .

The one online review makes the class , though many in-person students also report heavy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, and one review says missing class can directly reduce the grade.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students are split because she can be caring and , but , and work-heavy for others.

The online review is negative, while and strong avoidance warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Many reviews call her a , though several students still earned A grades.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative but limited, while and grade uncertainty.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and heavy expectations.

Format shift

The online review is strongly workload-negative, and .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching reviews are split between caring and and poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while but richer.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and some tests.

Format shift

Online mentions journals and speeches, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students appreciating feedback and care while , and heavy work.

Main concern

Students who need clear directions or .

What students said

“The class is a lot of work, but you get what you put into it.”
SPCH102GROUP
“ .”
SPEECH106
“As long as you show up to the lectures, pay attention and do the work, you'll get a solid grade in her class.”
SPCH106

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is negative and describes the course as exhausting, work-heavy, and expectation-heavy.

Main concern

The online workload feels excessive for a speech class.

What students said

“Too much work!!!”
SPCH102GROUP
“Exhausting!”
SPCH102GROUP
“I FELT like I was in an ENGLISH CLASS!!!!”
SPCH102GROUP

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignments And Speeches Matter

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but the and restrictions are not clearly proven.

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
SPCH106
“2 test, 2 reflection papers, 2 presentations.”
SPCH102GROUP
“Tests? Not many”
SPCH101

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is a lot of work, but you get what you put into it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting repeated patterns in , and polarized teaching experience; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She has examples of everything so you know what she wants.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Too much work!!!”

⚖️

36/100

“ if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Greco is tough, but really cares about her student s.
  • .
  • and scheduling of her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is a lot of work, but you get what you put into it.
  • Just do your work and you'll be fine.
  • Barely managed to get an A.

Theme 3

🕒

  • If you have perfect attendance she will add 2% to your grade, and vice versa she will deduct 2% for missing class.
  • If you show up, participate, and do the work in her class, you'll pass.
  • This Professor is strict, she starts class early and had a tough attitude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 29 reviews with detailed, recurring themes, though opinions are strongly polarized.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

SPCH1015 reviews
SPCH102GROUP5 reviews
COMM201A4 reviews
SPCH1064 reviews
SPEECH1024 reviews
Show 5 more courses
GROUPCOMM1023 reviews
1021 review
SPCH1031 review
SPEECH1011 review
SPEECH1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 9

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1