AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Scott Liddi

CA40545 · FSN134 · CA123 · CA21001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.2

The decision

if you want real cooking instruction or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLow Teaching EffortMandatory AttendancePoor Lab FeedbackRecipe-Only ClassWeak Learning Value
  • Students describe very easy course tasks but poor teaching value.
  • Attendance and .
  • work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The tasks sound easy, but C and B outcomes plus complaints about low lab grades make an A far from automatic.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Students repeatedly describe simple recipe-following with little intellectual challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Most reviews say attendance was mandatory or that skipping would hurt passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

, and comments strongly warn against taking him.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students reported low lab grades and mostly C or B outcomes despite easy work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Work appears light because students mainly show up, follow recipes, cook, and leave.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe little teaching, weak demonstrations, and poor learning value.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears based on lab participation and cooking work, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently , and class value.

Main concern

Students felt they had to show up and follow recipes without much instruction.

What students said

“Didn't show much interest in teaching.”
FSN134
“All you have to do is show up, and cook by following recipes in the book.”
CA123
“Terrible teacher! IF YOU WANT TO LEARN HOW TO COOK!!”
CA21001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible teacher! IF YOU WANT TO LEARN HOW TO COOK!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Didn't show much interest in teaching.”

⚖️

20/100

“ and everyone was upset about it.”

🚪 Recommendation

5/100

“ though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't do too much demos and I don't know if he really pays attention to what you make.
  • You just follow a recipe from the book, make it, then eat it, and leave.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's not very challenging or competitive.
  • All you have to do is show up, and cook by following recipes in the book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small and old, but the negative pattern is consistent across all 5 reviews.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FSN1342 reviews
CA1231 review
CA210011 review
CA405451 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values