AI Rate Professor

English

Jane Slama

ENGLISH101 · ENG103 · ENG102 · ENGL103 · ENG101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding discussion and writing course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadUnclear expectationsTough gradingDiscussion heavyPolarizing teaching style
  • Most reviews are negative and , and frustration with feedback.
  • A few students say the class can be rewarding if you work hard and use office hours.
  • This is not an easy A because major papers, participation, and writing style expectations create high effort and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned As, but comments repeatedly say the , and easy A expectations are wrong.

There are no online reviews, so .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject is introductory English, but the , and discussion format make it feel harder than standard composition.

There are no online reviews, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others do not, and participation-heavy comments imply class presence matters.

There are no online reviews, so .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The overall tone is negative because many students , and a miserable class experience.

There are no online reviews, and positive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students call her a and say she rarely gives As, though effort and office hours can help.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention huge homework, heavy reading, a semester-long field study, and a 15-page final paper.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

and growth, but most comments describe unclear instructions, limited useful criticism, and a frustrating classroom style.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, and in-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment evidence centers on papers, reading, field studies, writing projects, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding English class with , and divided student reactions.

Main concern

Students and harsh or subjective grading expectations.

What students said

“DO NOT expect an easy A!”
ENGLISH101
“ .”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly discuss papers and participation, and they do not clearly prove .

No Clear Exam EvidencePaper-Based AssessmentFinal Paper

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and field-study writing, while exam policy is not clearly proven by student comments.

Paper-Based AssessmentFinal PaperField Study
“Final paper is 15 pages.”
101
“you will be doing a semester long "field study" investigative journalism piece.”
101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just don't expect this class to be a walk in the park, it requires a lot of time and effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assignment design. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“what quickly let down by her huge amount of homework.”

⚖️

32/100

“DO NOT expect an easy A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • Doesn't provide constructive criticism.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Final paper is 15 pages.
  • it requires a lot of time and effort.
  • you will be doing a semester long "field study" investigative journalism piece.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • DO NOT expect an easy A!
  • Trying your hardest will get you a good grade.
  • rarely gave out As even to hardest workers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 14 reviews across many years with repeated themes, but the newest evidence is older and some opinions conflict.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 58
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
1012 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENG1021 review
ENGL1031 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1