AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

David Rackley

MUSIC104 · MUS104 · MUS120 · MUS100 · MUS101 · HIST101 · MUSIC100 · MUSIC101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless , and little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing InstructionsHard GraderPoor OrganizationUnhelpful FeedbackAvoid Online Class
  • , and weak support.
  • Students repeatedly say grades are harsh even when work is completed.
  • Online-labeled reviews are bad, and many in-person-labeled reviews also describe online-course problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say he withholds , and punishes missing work harshly.

Online reviews directly complain about hard grading, while many in-person-counted .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content may not always be hard, but , and poor organization make the course feel difficult.

Both formats point to confusion, with online and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

because most reviews discuss online work, deadlines, and assignments instead.

Online reviews do not prove attendance requirements, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because of , and poor support.

Both formats are negative, though one older in-person-counted review is positive for MUSIC104.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Multiple students say he is an and may deny an A even when work is completed.

Format shift

Online reviews and in-person-counted internet-course comments both support harsh grading.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students mention lots of assignments, papers, discussions, reports, deadlines, and required completion of every task.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many assignments and reports, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe him as .

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently poor, while older exception.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, papers, discussions, concert reports, and assignments, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-counted reviews are mostly negative and often still describe internet-course problems, with , and support.

Main concern

Students , and limited help.

What students said

“Horrible teacher!”
MUSIC100
“Just terrible.”
MUS100
“he's a pretty cool teacher in that class.”
MUSIC104

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing confusing , and frustrating quizzes or tests.

Main concern

Students feel and .

What students said

“Instructions and .”
MUS100
“You will feel blindsided when taking the quizzes and tests.”
MUS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe quizzes and tests as , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Quizzes And Tests Feel BlindsidingVague QuestionsStrict GradingPolicy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-counted reviews mention subjective tests and uncovered exam questions, but .

Subjective TestsVague QuestionsUncovered Exam MaterialPolicy Not Fully Proven
“ more than one answer but you had to pick only one.”
MUS104
“And the and concepts that aren't covered in the course material!”
MUS100

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and tests that feel blindsiding, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Quizzes And Tests Feel BlindsidingStrict GradingPolicy Not Fully Proven
“You will feel blindsided when taking the quizzes and tests.”
MUS101
“He is an , and .”
MUS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Instructions and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Instructions and .”

⚖️

10/100

“he won't give an A with .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instructions and .
  • Just terrible.
  • Pretty easy class...unorganized teacher...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he won't give an A with .
  • He is an , and .
  • if you expect to earn an easy A.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Quizzes

  • You will feel blindsided when taking the quizzes and tests.
  • more than one answer but you had to pick only one.
  • And the and concepts that aren't covered in the course material!

Theme 4

🚫 About Student Warnings

  • .
  • !!!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 15 reviews across many years with highly consistent negative details, despite old dates and one positive outlier.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MUS1004 reviews
MUSIC1004 reviews
400091 review
HIST1011 review
MUS1011 review
Show 4 more courses
MUS1041 review
MUS1201 review
MUSIC1011 review
MUSIC1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values