AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Irene Wong

MATH331 · MATH181 · MATH184 · MATHAMATICS141 · PRECALC · MATH131 · MATH121 · MATH141181 · MATH334 · MATH314 · CALC181 · ALGEBRA1 · MATH141 · MATH133 · MATH · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and mainly want a manageable grade path.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesEasy testsDisorganized pacingHelpful if askedBetter for self-learners
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but many students say her lectures are confusing, erratic, or .
  • Several students still describe easy tests, lenient timing, and decent grades for students who already know the material.
  • She is a risky choice for students who need clear step-by-step math instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be manageable because , but weak teaching means .

The , while in-person reviews vary by course and student independence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math content is not always advanced, but students often say she .

, while in-person comments focus more on and uneven pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Some recent credit reviews mark attendance mandatory, but most older comments .

The only online review marks attendance mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Many students warn against taking her because they find the .

Both formats contain risk signals, with the online review especially negative about class management.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Tests are described as easy or time-flexible, but some and self-study.

Format shift

Online grading is based on three easy tests, while but .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is not consistently described as heavy, but , and .

Format shift

and three tests, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive comments praise her care and math knowledge, but , and poor pacing.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as poorly run, while but often criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The and exams more than assignments.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews also mention exams and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but , and uneven pacing.

Main concern

because comments repeatedly mention confusion and disorganization.

What students said

“Somehow makes easy topics insanely difficult.”
121
“I understand math, I couldn't follow her at all.”
MATH184

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the class was poorly run, email help was weak, and grades came .

Main concern

Online organization and communication were poor.

What students said

“she had no clue how to run an online class.”
MATH331
“The big plus was that .”
MATH331

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support easy or time-flexible exams, but they .

Easy TestsExam-Heavy GradingExtra Exam Time

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Extra Exam Time
“Lenient on time for exams - gives extra 10 min if needed.”
MATH181

Online

The online review says the entire grade is based on three very easy tests, but .

Three TestsVery Easy Tests
“Your entire grade is based on 3 tests.”
MATH331
“The big plus was that .”
MATH331

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Better be good at learning from a . If not get ready to fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Somehow makes easy topics insanely difficult.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“If you want to do good in .”

🧪

62/100

“The big plus was that .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gets lost in her own problems and often seems like she doesn't know the material herself.
  • Very confusing way of teaching & .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is easy compared to other teachers.
  • Do your work and you will be o.k.
  • could have gotten an A easily.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Risk

  • We did not follow the book or her syllabus.
  • Covers 2 chapters in 3 months, then 4 chapters in 4 weeks.
  • if you want to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 33 reviews across many years with repeated themes, though many reviews are old and grade data is sparse.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1818 reviews
MATH3314 reviews
MATH1843 reviews
1811821832 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
Show 14 more courses
1211 review
1811411 review
1811821 review
ALGEBRA11 review
CALC1811 review
MATH1 review
MATH1211 review
MATH1311 review
MATH1331 review
MATH1411811 review
MATH3141 review
MATH3341 review
MATHAMATICS1411 review
PRECALC1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1