AI Rate Professor

English

Rose Adams

ENG101 · ENGL101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if , but disciplined writers may still pass by doing the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writing workloadUnclear lecturesMixed personality reviewsStrict essaysNo tests mentioned
  • Reviews are mostly in person and heavily split, but negative comments dominate the teaching experience.
  • Students , and high writing workload.
  • Some students say the class is passable or fair if you complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Students say good grades are possible if you do the work, but , and .

All evidence comes from in person reviews; there is no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The English content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the workload and .

Only in person reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and another says students had to sit through long class time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

, and excessive workload despite a few positive reviews.

All recommendation evidence is from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Some students say effort leads to a good grade, but others call her a .

Format shift

Only in person evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention many essays, nightly readings, journals, discussion boards, and .

Format shift

Only in person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews call her nice and fair, but many students describe her as .

Format shift

Only in person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The course appears driven , and oral presentation rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews describe a high-workload English course with mixed grading fairness and .

Main concern

The main concern is unclear instruction paired with , and response writing.

What students said

“A lot of work for a general ed class.”
ENGL101
“ .”
ENGL101
“Mrs Rose Adams was excellent!”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention no tests in one course and focus mostly on writing assignments, but .

No Tests MentionedEssaysReadingsDiscussion BoardsReviews Do Not Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews explicitly mention no tests in one course and , and discussions.

No Tests In One CourseEssay HeavyDiscussion Boards
“ .”
40879
“we had 8 .”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your looking for easy this is not the class for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, , and assignment structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“we had 8 .”

⚖️

42/100

“Shes also a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teacher rambles on about everything that is not important and leaves out information that is for our assignments.
  • , and not open to discussing any student's ideas.
  • Mrs Rose Adams was excellent!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of work for a general ed class.
  • All that being said, if you do the work, you will get a good grade.
  • She grades overly fair, assigns a reasonable amount of work and appreciates students who actually try.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • There was a lot of response writing on Blackboard for each book.
  • we had 8 .
  • She front loaded the class, so the first portion of the course was INSANE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

There are 14 detailed reviews with consistent workload themes, but the comments are old and student opinions are polarized.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENGL1016 reviews
408791 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values