AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marcus Verhaegh

PHIL114 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid him unless and and strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear TeachingHarsh Opinion-Based GradingMonotone LecturesStrict Writing LimitsAvoid Warning
  • The only review is strongly negative about teaching clarity and .
  • , but that does not offset the reported teaching problems.
  • Evidence is very limited because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The and opinion-dependent, making an A feel very hard to secure.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course experience is described as .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student strongly because of unclear teaching and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

The review says he grades tougher when student opinions differ from his own.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not fully described, but word limits on every question and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

The review describes him as , and not recommended.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only assessment clue is written questions with word limits, and there is .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and harsh grading tied to disagreement.

Main concern

The own.

What students said

“He's monotone and grades you tougher if your opinion differs from his own.”
PHIL114
“ and puts word limits on EVERY question.”
PHIL114
“ ”
PHIL114

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the requirements.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's monotone and grades you tougher if your opinion differs from his own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“ and puts word limits on EVERY question.”

⚖️

5/100

“grades you tougher if your opinion differs from his own.”

👎 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's monotone

Theme 2

⚖️

  • grades you tougher if your opinion differs from his own.
  • He never admits anyone is right

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Make sure to do your research on professors

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative signal is strong but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1141 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1