AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tahmineh Romero

MATH124 · MATH123 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you can handle a difficult math class and actively ask for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful if you askVery tough courseHeavy homeworkMixed clarityLenient grading
  • Students consistently describe the math course as tough and work-heavy.
  • Positive and .
  • Negative reviews cite handwriting, accent, off-topic teaching, and self-teaching risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible, but students describe the class as tough and , and asking for help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content is difficult, especially early on, and several students report high difficulty or self-teaching.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Two reviews list attendance as mandatory, while the other .

and is incomplete.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Romero can work for students who ask for help, but and self-teaching complaints make her risky.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

One review directly says she is very lenient with grading, though the class itself remains hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention a tough class and a lot of homework, so the workload is not light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and serious complaints about clarity, handwriting, and off-topic lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, while exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some students found Romero helpful and clear, while others struggled with clarity and self-teaching.

Main concern

The course can be tough, homework-heavy, and .

What students said

“this class is tough, but if you study and ask for help, then you'll pass.”
MATH123
“You pretty much have to teach yourself everything”
MATH123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this class is tough, but if you study and ask for help, then you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and help. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Difficulty

28/100

“this class is tough, but if you study and ask for help, then you'll pass.”

🤝 Helpfulness

58/100

“Mrs. , and she goes beyond that to help you if you are willing to do the work.”

⚖️

74/100

“She's also very lenient with .”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

42/100

“You pretty much have to teach yourself everything”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I never have an .
  • .
  • Very unprofessional and can't understand.
  • sloppy handwriting and hard to understand her accent

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this class is tough, but if you study and ask for help, then you'll pass.
  • There's a lot of homework.
  • She's also very lenient with .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Mrs. , and she goes beyond that to help you if you are willing to do the work.
  • She will help you understand.
  • she did go out of her way to help you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are four reviews with consistent difficulty signals but mixed teaching opinions and older dates.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1232 reviews
1231 review
MATH1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1