AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Rabinowitz Craig.E

PHIL102 · PH121 · PH102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want serious ideas and can handle an .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIntellectualKnowledge-focusedTake-home examsReading-heavySupportive thinker
  • Students describe him as intellectually strong and deeply committed to learning.
  • Workload depends on the course, with but at least one very light survey course.
  • Evidence is old and limited, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The and a short essay, but harder philosophy sections still require real reading and attention.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Some content is survey-level and easy, but other comments describe complex philosophy ideas and .

, and course difficulty varies by class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Students mostly value his knowledge and serious teaching, though one low quality rating and limited evidence keep the recommendation measured.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The and a short essay in one course, with no harsh grading complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

One class sounds very light, while but as not overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person workload evidence varies by course, and there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students describe him as knowledgeable, intellectually serious, and available, though ratings are mixed and old.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

The and final plus one essay, while other courses do not give enough detail.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

knowledge, meaningful class content, and variable workload by course.

Main concern

Some courses involve complex ideas and large amounts of reading.

What students said

“He expects a lot and he gives a lot; the hallmarks of a great teacher.”
PHIL102
“a and Final, & a 3 page Essay on any topic remotely related to a religion.”
PH121
“Large amounts of .”
PH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and final, making exam risk low for that course.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalShort Essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports take-home exams in PH121, but other courses .

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home Final
“a and Final, & a 3 page Essay on any topic remotely related to a religion.”
PH121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He expects a lot and he gives a lot; the hallmarks of a great teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He expects a lot and he gives a lot; the hallmarks of a great teacher.”

📚 Course Challenge

55/100

“Large amounts of .”

📝

86/100

“a and Final, & a 3 page Essay on any topic remotely related to a religion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • What he teaches has merit far beyond the classroom.
  • Genuinely interested in student's thoughts/ideations.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is the easiest class he teaches.
  • Large amounts of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, but the comments contain useful detail and mostly consistent themes.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PH1021 review
PH1211 review
PHIL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values