AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Scott Schaller

GRAPH111 · GRPH110 · GRPH111 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Scott Schaller looks easy and potentially helpful, but the evidence is thin and one detailed review is strongly negative.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeableEasy CourseMixed HelpfulnessLimited Evidence
  • Most ratings are high and difficulty is low, but two positive reviews have no written comments.
  • The main positive evidence says he is knowledgeable and easy to talk to.
  • One detailed negative review and led the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The course difficulty ratings are very low, but comments do .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Difficulty ratings are very low, and there is no comment evidence that the course content is intellectually hard.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person reviews , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Most ratings are positive, but one detailed review reports a bad experience and weak support.

Recommendation and is limited by the small sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The low difficulty suggests manageable grading, but comments .

Format shift

online evidence.

Workload

Light

78/100

Very low difficulty ratings suggest a light course, though written workload details are sparse.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

The and approachable, but the strongest negative review says he was useless for help.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and there is no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews suggest an easy course with some knowledgeable instruction, but the small sample includes one severe support complaint.

Main concern

The clearest negative review says he did not provide useful help or guidance.

What students said

“Knows what he is talking about.”
GRPH110
“He was useless when asking for help or guidance.”
GRPH111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or exam difficulty.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Knows what he is talking about.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting the limited but most concrete teaching and support evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“Knows what he is talking about.”

⚠️ Support Risk

40/100

“He was useless when asking for help or guidance.”

📉 Course Ease

84/100

“He is easy to talk to, and is very knowledgable about Graphic Designing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knows what he is talking about.
  • He is easy to talk to, and is very knowledgable about Graphic Designing.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Support

  • He was useless when asking for help or guidance.
  • Horrible experience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, two have no comments, and the detailed evidence is mixed.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GRAPH1112 reviews
GRPH1101 review
GRPH1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values