AI Rate Professor

Communication

Ethelwynne Reeves

SPEECHCOMM101 · SPEECH103 · SPCH110 · SPEEC101 · COMMCOMM · SPEEC1788 · COMM110 · SPEEC102 · ENGL103 · SPECH101 · SPCH101 · SPEECH · SPEEC110 · SPEECH101 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive communication instructor and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackFair but sometimes picky gradingComfortable class environmentEnjoyable communication topics
  • Most students describe Reeves as helpful, funny, and good at making speech classes comfortable.
  • Grades are usually fair, but several students say she can be picky or unclear.
  • Work is manageable, with speeches, discussions, quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A looks realistic if students follow directions and submit quality speeches, but it is not effortless because .

, while in-person evidence shows fair outcomes with stricter grading concerns.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course content is approachable for most students, but public speaking and .

Online evidence calls the subject interesting, while in-person evidence shows the speech format can feel easy or stressful depending on the student.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes communication classes feel useful.

The single online review is positive, and most in-person reviews are positive despite several strong complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

as fair, but multiple students say she grades hard or is picky.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and harsh-grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is mostly manageable, with speeches, discussions, quizzes, and assignments rather than overwhelming volume.

Format shift

Online work is described as tough but manageable, while if students keep up.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews praise her humor, feedback, and ability to create a comfortable class, but .

Format shift

, while and more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears to mix speeches, discussions, quizzes, tests, and written work rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments and discussions, while in-person evidence mentions speeches, quizzes, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, praising her humor, comfort in class, and helpful advice, while a and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“she made the class very comfortable and .”
SPCH101
“She does grade hard but if you do what she asks and you present quality work you will get an A.”
SPCH101
“she is not that great of a teacher grades too harshly.”
SPEECH101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review says the class was worthwhile, interesting, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She did however , but manageable ones.”
SPEECH103
“ !”
SPEECH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but .

QuizzesTestsSpeeches

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes and tests, but .

QuizzesTests
“u can bs the quizzes.”
SPCH101
“ if you read the little chapters that were required.”
SPECH101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does grade hard but if you do what she asks and you present quality work you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“she made the class very comfortable and .”

⚖️

55/100

“She does grade hard but if you do what she asks and you present quality work you will get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“Such a great teacher! I would recommend her 8 week course”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • shes
  • She enjoys what she teaches so it makes the class enjoyable.
  • She has a blunt sense of humore and always has our class laughin :] great teacher !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the outline like she says and you'll be fine.
  • The workload was tolerable and she grades very fairly.
  • she is not that great of a teacher grades too harshly.

Theme 3

💬

  • !
  • Ms. Reeves is a very good instructor and reliable with feedback.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 24 reviews with consistent themes, but many are old and several contain limited detail.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SPCH1015 reviews
SPEECH1014 reviews
SPEEC1013 reviews
SPCH1102 reviews
COMM1101 review
Show 9 more courses
COMMCOMM1 review
ENGL1031 review
SPECH1011 review
SPEEC1021 review
SPEEC1101 review
SPEEC17881 review
SPEECH1 review
SPEECH1031 review
SPEECHCOMM1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1