AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mike Mogull

MATH131 · MATH242 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are comfortable keeping pace in math and , and do homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed ReviewsFast PaceRespectful TeacherShow Up RequiredMath Can Be Hard
  • Student experience is split between one very negative fast-paced math review and one positive pre-calc review.
  • Success seems tied to showing up, taking notes, and .
  • The teaching quality is uncertain because the two reviews strongly conflict.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A seems possible with , and homework, but the fast pace can make the effort high for weaker math students.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course can feel easy to follow for prepared students but very difficult when the pace is too fast.

Only in-person comments describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as mandatory, but one positive review says showing up is needed to follow the class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Recommendation depends heavily on math readiness because one while another praises his respectful style.

Recommendation and is conflicting.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews , so the safest judgment is neutral.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but reviews do not show an extreme workload.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching is highly inconsistent across reviews, ranging from not that great to funny, nice, and respectful.

Format shift

Teaching and is split.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

and notes but do not clearly prove whether exams or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews conflict sharply, with one student warning against the pace and another saying the class is easy to follow with steady effort.

Main concern

The main concern is a fast pace that can make the class hard to keep up with.

What students said

“He goes through everything incredibly fast and it is very hard to keep up!”
MATH131
“the class itself is easy to follow as , and do the homework.”
MATH242

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring rules, or exam difficulty.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He goes through everything incredibly fast and it is very hard to keep up!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split between pace concerns and positive classroom tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Not that great of a teacher to be honest, seems new to teaching.”

⚖️ Mixed Experience

47/100

“Great guy. Funny and nice.”

📈 Effort Needed

52/100

“the class itself is easy to follow as , and do the homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not that great of a teacher to be honest, seems new to teaching.
  • Great guy. Funny and nice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Pace

  • He goes through everything incredibly fast and it is very hard to keep up!
  • the class itself is easy to follow as , and do the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 2 old reviews and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1311 review
MATH2421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values