AI Rate Professor

Design

Katie Walters

FCS143 · FCS137 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and weak instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesMandatory attendanceBusy workHigh effortPoor classroom experience
  • Students describe lectures as unrelated or repetitive.
  • because one review says it mostly affects the grade.
  • The workload feels busy rather than useful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a high grade seems to require attendance and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content is not described as conceptually deep, but the course feels difficult because and repetitive.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

One student says students must attend because .

, and online evidence is absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students criticize the teaching style, workload, and classroom structure more than they praise the professor.

The recommendation signal comes only from in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and classroom participation, which students describe negatively.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of repeated busy work and frequent in-class presentation pressure.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students describe lectures as rambling, repetitive, and poorly connected to learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews mention attendance, standing up in class, and busy work, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and attendance pressure.

Main concern

Students may spend time on attendance and .

What students said

“she is constantly rambaling about nothing that has to do with class.”
FCS143
“She assigns lots of the same busy work & I felt like I was being treated like a child.”
FCS137

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She assigns lots of the same busy work & I felt like I was being treated like a child.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“she is constantly rambaling about nothing that has to do with class.”

📚 Workload Value

25/100

“She assigns lots of the same busy work & I felt like I was being treated like a child.”

🚪

5/100

“MUST attend class cause thats how she mostly bases your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is constantly rambaling about nothing that has to do with class.
  • I felt the info could have been taught & learned in a more fun manner than doing the same thing over and over again until it was ingrained in our brains.

Theme 2

📌 About Class Requirements

  • she makes you stand up in front of everybody for most of this course.
  • MUST attend class cause thats how she mostly bases your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, though both point to similar teaching and workload problems.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FCS1371 review
FCS1431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values