AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

G Moran

LOGIC101 · PHILO121 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take G Moran if and participation for a likely manageable grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A PotentialReading RequiredMixed LecturesHelpful When Engaged
  • Several students found the class easy if they completed the required work.
  • Lecture quality is mixed, with both passionate teaching and boring delivery reported.
  • , and a presentation are the main effort drivers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The A appears reachable with basic completion of , and participation, but not with zero effort.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course is described as pretty easy, though required reading and participation add some challenge.

Only in-person comments discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The as mandatory in the clearest reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students are split between appreciating his knowledge and criticizing boring lectures and required work.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Comments suggest he rewards serious effort and may still give an A even when grades during the course are not perfect.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and a presentation are required, but several students still describe the class as easy.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students describe him as knowledgeable and helpful, but also report boring and dry lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework, reading, participation, and a presentation, with .

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessment work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show an easy-to-manage class for engaged students but mixed lecture quality.

Main concern

Some students found the lectures boring and reading-heavy.

What students said

“Just do what's asked and you'll get one too.”
PHILO121
“Really boring lectures , hate the fact that you have to do a presentation for the class and ”
PHILO121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do what's asked and you'll get one too.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He's a good soul and seems truly passionate about this topic.”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“I found this class to be an easy A.”

⚠️ Main Concern

55/100

“Really boring lectures, dry humor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's well-educated and has a lot of knowledge to offer.
  • Really boring lectures, dry humor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy, just show him that u are taking class seriously even you don't get nice grade, you will still get A after the course.
  • You have to read to pass, if you do not read, you will not pass, just saying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are five reviews with mixed detail, but they are old and only one format is represented.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILO1214 reviews
LOGIC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1