AI Rate Professor

Education

Lisa Draper

ECS116 · ECS106 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are comfortable with and can handle limited instructor response.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFun ProjectsSlow ResponsesMixed ReviewsNot Enough Evidence
  • One review says the class is fun and project-based.
  • One review and .
  • The dataset is very small, old, and fully counted as in person by the provided format fields.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty looks moderate to low, but there is no grade evidence and poor responsiveness may raise the effort needed.

All because onlineReviewCount is 0, even though one comment self-describes an online class.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course seems manageable and project-based, but one student reports support problems.

Only in-person-counted reviews exist, so there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person-counted reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation is mixed because one student enjoyed the projects while another .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The , so grading leniency cannot be strongly inferred.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Projects are described positively, and no review complains about excessive workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

The teaching experience is mixed, with .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only concrete .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The experience and poor responsiveness.

Main concern

Instructor response time may be unreliable.

What students said

“I have the online class and . ”
ECS116
“This is a fun class and I do enjoy doing the projects.”
ECS106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or exam format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have the online class and . ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting project enjoyment and response-time concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I have the online class and . ”

🧩 Project Experience

65/100

“This is a fun class and I do enjoy doing the projects.”

👍 Recommendation Level

42/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Instructor Support

  • I have the online class and .

Theme 2

🧩 About Projects

  • This is a fun class and I do enjoy doing the projects.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they provide limited detail with conflicting sentiment.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECS1061 review
ECS1161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values