AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Nikolas Kastor

ENGR162 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are comfortable asking questions early and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderParticipation MattersDifferent RubricCheck In OftenCool Professor
  • The only review says Kastor is cool and .
  • The main risk is that .
  • Students may need to check in with him to stay aligned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but the and and follow his expectations.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course seems challenging because the and require active clarification.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, and participation matters.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

The and calls him cool, but the .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The tough-grader tag and expect.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not clearly describe workload volume, so workload confidence is limited.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

The student describes him positively but gives a .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only concrete assessment evidence is about rubrics and instruction manuals, not exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person review is positive overall but warns that .

Main concern

.

What students said

“He's cool. and how he grades are very different from the instruction manuals. Just check in with him.”
ENGR162

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the Browser, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's cool. and how he grades are very different from the instruction manuals. Just check in with him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“He's cool.”

⚖️

30/100

“ and how he grades are very different from the instruction manuals.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Just check in with him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's cool.
  • Just check in with him.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and how he grades are very different from the instruction manuals.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it is recent and .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values