AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Tellef Tellefson

ART160 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a fair, project-based graphic design class with a supportive instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportiveFairChillProject-basedRecommended
  • Both students earned A grades and .
  • One student strongly praises his knowledge, support, and fairness.
  • The course has obscure projects, but the workload is not described as extreme.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Both reported grades are A, and the workload sounds manageable, but the sample is too small to call it automatic.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The class seems manageable, but and a moderate difficulty rating keep it from being clearly easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and the other does not clarify it.

There are no online reviews, so .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and one gives a strong recommendation based on support and fairness.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Both students earned A grades, and one explicitly calls him fair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Projects exist and may be unusual, but students do not describe the workload as heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

The limited evidence describes him as knowledgeable, supportive, fair, and chill.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as , and manageable.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Great professor! Knowledgeable, supportive and fair.”
Art160
“He was chill, lots of obscure projects but nothing too crazy”
Art160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove any exam .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor! Knowledgeable, supportive and fair. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, projects, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Great professor! Knowledgeable, supportive and fair.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ !”

📌 Workload Shape

65/100

“He was chill, lots of obscure projects but nothing too crazy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor! Knowledgeable, supportive and fair.
  • He was chill, lots of obscure projects but nothing too crazy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • nothing too crazy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the positive pattern is useful but not deeply proven.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Art1602 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values